Rai et al v. GMAC Mortgage

Filing 18

ORDER re 17 setting deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order. Signed by Judge Koh on 12/13/2010. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2010)

Rai et al v. GMAC Mortgage

Doc. 18

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 JAGDIPIK RAI AND RIMPPI RAI, v. GMAC MORTGAGE, Defendant. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 10-CV-04291-LHK ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (re: docket #17)

On December 11, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a "Second Motion for Temporary Restraining Order." See Dkt. #17. Although that three-page motion lacks details, Plaintiffs do note that the property involved in this foreclosure action is "scheduled to be sold at auction on December 21, 2010." The Court denied Plaintiffs' first motion for a temporary restraining order because Plaintiffs: 1) did not provide Defendant notice of the motion; and 2) provided no reason why notice should not be required. See September 27, 2010 Order Denying Plaintiffs' Petition for Temporary Injunction [dkt. #7]. Plaintiffs filed their second motion for a temporary restraining order on the Court electronic filing system (ECF), in which electronic notice was sent to Defendant's counsel. Accordingly, Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiffs' Second Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Wednesday, December 15, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 13, 2010 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge

Case No.: 10-CV-04291-LHK ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND
Dockets.Justia.com