Ogawa v. Normark Enterprises, Inc.

Filing 25

ORDER (1) VACATING SUBMISSION OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, (2) RE-SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND (3) SETTING CASE MANAGEMENTCONFERENCE. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 19 MOTION for Default Judgment as to LJS Manufacturing, In c.. Plaintiff supplemental briefing due by 8/19/2011. Motion Hearing set for 8/26/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Case Management Conference set for 8/26/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/28/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 10-04308 EJD OGAWA, 11 ORDER (1) VACATING SUBMISSION OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, (2) RE-SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND (3) SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Plaintiff(s), v. For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 NORMARK ENTERPRISES, INC., 13 Defendant(s). 14 15 / On July 14, 2011, the Court took Plaintiff Richard T. Ogawa’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for 16 Default Judgment under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The Court 17 hereby VACATES its submission of Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment and resets the hearing 18 as follows: Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment as to LJS Manufacturing, Inc. is re-set for 19 hearing on 8/26/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. 20 Davila. 21 In light of the recent ruling from the Federal Circuit In re BP Lubricants USA Inc. 637 F.3d 22 1307 (Fed. Cir. 2011), in which the pleading requirements for false marking were clearly articulated 23 to require pleading with particularity pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b), the Court finds that it would 24 benefit from supplemental briefing from Plaintiff on the issue. Accordingly, on or before 25 8/19/2011, Plaintiff shall file a supplemental brief addressing the effect of In re BP Lubricants, Alan 26 Neuman Productions, Inc. v. Albright, 862 F.2d 1388, 1392 (9th Cir. 1988) and any other relevant 27 cases on Plaintiff’s request for default judgment. 28 1 NO. C 10-04308 EJD ORDER (1) VACATING SUBMISSION OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, (2) RE-SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND (3) SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Plaintiff’s Case Management Statement filed on May 5, 2011 requested a Case Management 2 Conference to discuss recent information that has come to the attention of Plaintiff, indicating that 3 another Defendant should be named in the lawsuit that has effectively assumed the product and sale 4 of the products that were previously manufactured and sold by the current Defendant. Accordingly, 5 Plaintiff shall appear to discuss this issue at a Case Management Conference on 8/26/11 at 10:00 6 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: July 28, 2011 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 NO. C 10-04308 EJD ORDER (1) VACATING SUBMISSION OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, (2) RE-SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND (3) SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?