Williams v. Countrywide Home Loans et al

Filing 4

ORDER re 3 Plaintiff's Notice of Lis Pendens. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/01/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2010)

Download PDF
Williams v. Countrywide Home Loans et al Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ** E-filed October 1, 2010 ** NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MARILOU WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. [Re: Docket No. 3] COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ Pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. 405.21, pro se plaintiff Marilou Williams seeks this Court's approval of her Notice of Lis Pendens ("Notice"), a copy of which is appended to this order. No. C10-04351 HRL ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 For the Northern District of California Her complaint appears to potentially affect title to or the right to possession of the real property 19 20 21 complaint necessarily have merit, and defendants may upon a proper showing ask for an order 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE described in the proposed Notice. Therefore, the Notice is approved. However, she is advised that this approval is not to be construed as a suggestion by this court that any of the claims made in the expunging the Lis Pendens and/or dismissing the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 1, 2010 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C10-04351 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: Notice will be provided by other means to: Marilou Williams 2524 Glen Ian Court San Jose, CA 95148 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?