Ramirez v. United Rentals, Inc.

Filing 63

ORDER RE: AMENDED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT. The court orders the parties to file an Amended Joint Case Management Statement which complies with this District's Standing Order on or before 7/12/2013. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/2/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2013)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

SAN JOSE DIVISION

5

CASE NO. 5:10-cv-04374 EJD

DANIEL RAMIREZ, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

6

ORDER RE: AMENDED JOINT CASE
MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

7

Plaintiff(s),
v.

8
UNITED RENTALS, INC.,
9
10

Defendant(s).

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

/
11
12
13
14

On June 14, 2013, the court ordered the parties to file a Joint Case Management Statement.
See Docket Item No. 61. The parties did so on June 28, 2013. See Docket Item No. 62.
Having reviewed the statement, the court finds that it does not comply with the Standing

15

Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California concerning the contents of a Joint Case

16

Management Statement. Specifically, the parties did not sufficiently address alternative dispute

17

resolution or provide a schedule as required.1 Accordingly, the court orders the parties to file an

18

Amended Joint Case Management Statement which complies with this District’s Standing Order on

19

or before July 12, 2013.

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

Dated: July 2, 2013
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

As to ADR, the Standing Order requires the parties to address “[p]rospects for settlement,
ADR efforts to date, and a specific ADR plan for the case, including compliance with ADR L.R. 3-5
and a description of key discovery or motions necessary to position the parties to negotiate a
resolution.” With regard to scheduling, the Standing Order requires proposed dates “for designation
of experts, discovery cutoff, hearing of dispositive motions, pretrial conference and trial.”
1
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-04374 EJD
ORDER RE: AMENDED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT