Alfaro v. Tilton et al
Filing
73
ORDER. Plaintiff's opposition is currently due no later than July 29, 2012. Defendant shall file a reply to within 15 days thereafter. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 69 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 7/29/2012. Replies due by 8/13/2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/10/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
D. HIGGERSON, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
_________________________________ )
CESAR ALFARO,
12
13
14
15
16
No. C 10-04416 EJD (PR)
ORDER
17
18
The Ninth Circuit recently held that "Rand and Wyatt notices must be served
19
concurrently with motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment so that pro se
20
prisoners will have fair, timely and adequate notice of what is required of them in order to
21
oppose those motions." Woods v. Carey, Nos. 09-15548 & 09-16113, slip op. 7871, 7874
22
(9th Cir. July 6, 2012). Because it appears that a Rand notice was not served concurrently
23
with the pending motion for summary judgment in this case, the Court will provide said
24
notice now:
25
Plaintiff is advised that a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of
26
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. Rule
27
56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary
28
judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no
Order
N:\Pro - Se & Death Penalty Orders\July 2012\Alfaro04416_notice.wpd1
1
genuine issue of material fact – that is, if there is no real dispute about any
2
fact that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for
3
summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will
4
end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary
5
judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn
6
testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead,
7
you must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to
8
interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in Rule 56(e), that
9
contradicts the facts shown in the defendant's declarations and documents
10
and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do
11
not submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if
12
appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary judgment is granted,
13
your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial. Rand v. Rowland,
14
154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc) (App A).
15
Plaintiff’s opposition is currently due no later than July 29, 2012. Defendant shall file a
16
reply to within 15 days thereafter.
17
18
DATED:
7/10/2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order
N:\Pro - Se & Death Penalty Orders\July 2012\Alfaro04416_notice.wpd2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
CESAR ALFARO,
Case Number: CV10-04416 EJD
6
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
7
v.
8
JAMES TILTON et al,
9
Defendant.
10
11
12
13
14
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on July 13, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
15
16
17
18
19
20
Cesar Alfaro E-68257
Pelican Bay State Prison
P.O. Box 7500
Crescent City, CA 95531
Dated: July 13, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
/s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order
N:\Pro - Se & Death Penalty Orders\July 2012\Alfaro04416_notice.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?