Tessera, Inc. v. UTAC (Taiwan) Corporaiton

Filing 311

ORDER RE MOTION FOR PARTIAL RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 294 Objection filed by Tessera, Inc. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-2, Defendant UTAC (Taiwan) Corporation shall file its written opposition to Plaintif f Tessera, Inc.s Motion for Partial Relief from Non-Dispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge (Docket Item No. 294), if any, on or before June 5, 2015. Any opposition brief shall not exceed five pages in length. No reply brief shall be filed or considered. The Motion will then be deemed submitted for decision and the court will issue an order based on the pleadings. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/19/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 TESSERA, INC., Case No. 5:10-cv-04435-EJD Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 11 UTAC (TAIWAN) CORPORATION, United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Re: Dkt. No. 294 12 13 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-2, Defendant UTAC (Taiwan) Corporation shall file its 14 written opposition to Plaintiff Tessera, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Relief from Non-Dispositive 15 Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge (Docket Item No. 294), if any, on or before June 5, 2015. Any 16 opposition brief shall not exceed five pages in length. No reply brief shall be filed or considered. 17 The Motion will then be deemed submitted for decision and the court will issue an order based on 18 the pleadings. 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 19, 2015 ______________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 5:10-cv-04435-EJD ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?