Tessera, Inc. v. UTAC (Taiwan) Corporaiton
Filing
311
ORDER RE MOTION FOR PARTIAL RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 294 Objection filed by Tessera, Inc. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-2, Defendant UTAC (Taiwan) Corporation shall file its written opposition to Plaintif f Tessera, Inc.s Motion for Partial Relief from Non-Dispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge (Docket Item No. 294), if any, on or before June 5, 2015. Any opposition brief shall not exceed five pages in length. No reply brief shall be filed or considered. The Motion will then be deemed submitted for decision and the court will issue an order based on the pleadings. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/19/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
TESSERA, INC.,
Case No. 5:10-cv-04435-EJD
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
11
UTAC (TAIWAN) CORPORATION,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendant.
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL
RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE
PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
Re: Dkt. No. 294
12
13
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-2, Defendant UTAC (Taiwan) Corporation shall file its
14
written opposition to Plaintiff Tessera, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Relief from Non-Dispositive
15
Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge (Docket Item No. 294), if any, on or before June 5, 2015. Any
16
opposition brief shall not exceed five pages in length. No reply brief shall be filed or considered.
17
The Motion will then be deemed submitted for decision and the court will issue an order based on
18
the pleadings.
19
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 19, 2015
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 5:10-cv-04435-EJD
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL
ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?