Vendio Services, Inc v. P.S. Products, Inc et al
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Request to Continue Motion Hearing and Case Management Conference from 12/20/2010 to 2/14/2011 re 18 Stipulation. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction: Motion Hearing set for 2/14/ 2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/4/2011. Case Management Conference set for 2/14/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/18/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O
DARRYL M. WOO (CSB NO. 100513) dwoo@fenwick.com RYAN J. MARTON (CSB NO. 223979) rmarton@fenwick.com LESLIE A. KRAMER (CSB NO. 253313) lkramer@fenwick.com FENWICK &WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile:(415) 281-1350 Attorneys for Plaintiff Vendio Services, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION VENDIO SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, v. Plaintiffs, Case No. 5:10-cv-04455 JW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
P.S. PRODUCTS, INC., an Arkansas corporation, and BILLY PENNINGTON, an individual, Defendants. WHEREAS, Plaintiff Vendio Services, Inc. ("Vendio") filed this declaratory judgment action on October 1, 2010; WHEREAS, Defendants P.S. Products, Inc. and Billy Pennington (collectively, Defendants) filed their Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer ("Motion") on October 27, 2010; WHEREAS, Defendants' Motion is currently scheduled for hearing on December 20, 2010; WHEREAS, Vendio is seeking jurisdictional discovery in order to support its opposition to Defendants' Motion; WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed to continue the hearing of Defendants'
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-04455 JW
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O
Motion until February 14, 2010; WHEREAS, the initial CMC is scheduled for December 20, 2010; WHEREAS, Defendants' counsel resides in Arkansas; WHEREAS, the parties agree it would be more convenient and efficient to hold the initial CMC on the same day as the hearing on Defendants' Motion; ACCORDINGLY, the parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree that the hearing on Defendants' Motion should be continued until February 14, 2010 and hereby request that the initial CMC be rescheduled for that same day. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: November 15, 2010 FENWICK & WEST LLP By: /s/ Ryan J. Marton Ryan J. Marton Attorneys for Plaintiff Vendio Services, Inc. Dated: November 15, 2010 STEWART LAW FIRM By: /s/ Chris H. Stewart Chris H. Stewart Attorneys for Defendants P.S. Products, Inc. and Billy Pennington
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
18 Dated: November ___, 2010
[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
By: Honorable James Ware
2
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-04455 JW
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Ryan J. Marton, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from any signatories indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 15th day of November 2010, at San Francisco, California. FENWICK & WEST LLP By: /s/ Ryan J. Marton Ryan J. Marton Attorneys for Plaintiff Vendio Services, Inc.
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
3
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-04455 JW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?