Naser v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
Filing
110
ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT Granting 109 Stipulation Modifying Pre-Trial and Trial Dates. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 1/29/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
RACHEL B. COWEN (SBN 6217360) (Pro Hac Vice)
rachel.cowen@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
203 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1900
Chicago, IL 60601
Tel: (312) 368-7044
Fax: (312) 251-5844
Attorney for Defendants
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
METLIFE ENTERPRISE GENERAL INSURANCE
AGENCY, INC., and METLIFE SECURITIES
7
8
9
10
RICHARD B. GLICKMAN (Bar No. CA 47898)
glickmanlawcorp@yahoo.com
RICHARD B. GLICKMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORP.
One Maritime Plaza, Suite 1600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (415) 362-7685
Fax: (415) 781-1034
11
12
Attorney for Plaintiff
LOAY S. NASER
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
18
LOAY S. NASER,
19
20
21
22
CASE NO. CV 5:10-04475 EJD
Plaintiff,
v.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY, METLIFE ENTERPRISE
GENERAL INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.
AND METLIFE SECURITIES,
STIPULATION [AND XXXXXXXX
PROPOSED
ORDER] TO MODIFY PRE-TRIAL AND
TRIAL DATES
23
Defendants.
24
25
26
Plaintiff LOAY S. NASER (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants METROPOLITAN LIFE
27
INSURANCE COMPANY, METLIFE ENTERPRISE GENERAL INSURANCE AGENCY,
28
INC., AND METLIFE SECURITIES (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their attorneys
-1-
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
EAST\54776709.2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CV 10-04475 EJD
1
2
3
of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
Pursuant to the Court’s July 3, 2012 Pre-Trial Order (ECF No. 61), the following dates are
set in this matter:
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
EVENT
Final Pre-Trial Conference
Joint Final Pre-Trial Conference
Statements, Motions in Limine, and
Exchange of Exhibits
Voir Dire Questions, Proposed Jury
Instructions, and Proposed Jury Verdict
Forms
Jury Selection
Jury Trial
12
13
Jury Deliberations
DATE
3/15/13 at 11:00 a.m.
3/1/13
3/5/13
3/25/13 at 9:00 a.m.
3/27/13 (full day); 4/1/13 (½ day); 4/24/4 (full days); 4/8 (½ day); 4/9 (full
day); 4/11 (full day); 4/15 (½ day); 4/164/18 (full days)
4/22 – 4/26/13
14
15
Counsel for the Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court extend the pre-trial and trial
16
dates for two reasons. First, counsel for both parties have a religious conflict with the existing
17
pre-trial and trial dates. Specifically, counsel for the Plaintiff is an observant Jew and will be
18
unavailable for trial during the Passover holiday, which begins at sundown on March 25, 2013,
19
and concludes at sundown on April 2, 2013. Counsel for the Defendants, as well as Defendants’
20
in-house counsel, are also Jewish and will be unavailable during the first two days of Passover
21
(March 25th and 27th).
22
Counsel for the Defendants does not object to counsel for Plaintiff’s request to
23
accommodate the Passover holiday. However, the court’s trial calendar and counsel for the
24
Defendants’ trial schedule is such that the Passover holiday cannot be accommodated by pushing
25
back the dates of the trial as it is currently scheduled.
26
Specifically, to avoid the Passover holiday, jury selection would need to be moved to
27
Monday, April 8, 2013. To compensate for this move, five full additional trial days would need
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
-2EAST\54776709.2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CV 10-04475 EJD
1
to be added to the currently-scheduled end-date of April 18, 2013. The trial would then conclude
2
on April 30, 2013, with jury deliberations set for the week of May 6 – 10, 2013.
3
However, defense counsel has a pre-trial conference set for May 1, 2013, and trial set for
4
May 20, 2013, in another matter, Potter v. MetLife et. al., Case 11-C-51, in the Circuit Court of
5
Putnam County, West Virginia. Following that trial, Defense counsel’s schedule is such that she
6
is not available until after August 1, 2013: counsel has a pre-trial conference set for June 6, 2013,
7
and trial set for June 18, 2013, in another matter, Silk v. Heyer, et. al., Case No. 2011 L 009961,
8
in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois; and will be out of the country on a pre-paid
9
vacation during the first week of July 2013.
10
11
12
Both counsel are thereafter freely available except for the Jewish holidays -- i.e.,
September 4-6, 13, 18-20 and 25-27, and for the period from October 28-November 8.
Second, counsel for Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court extend the pre-trial and
13
trial dates because he needs time to obtain new co-counsel and give them an opportunity to
14
properly learn the case and then participate fully in all pre-trial and trial tasks. Specifically, on
15
December 19, 2012, then co-counsel for Plaintiff (i.e., Work/Environment Law Group) filed a
16
Disassociation as Counsel with this Court, which the Court approved on December 20, 2012.
17
Plaintiff has diligently sought a replacement co-counsel and has received expressions of
18
interest, but a lack of willingness to commit to become co-counsel until after the Court rules on
19
the parties’ pending motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 89 and 94) and Defendants’
20
motion to strike. (ECF No. 71). The three motions are set for Hearing before the Court on March
21
1, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. Once new co-counsel for Plaintiff is retained, co-counsel will need a
22
reasonable time to prepare for trial. Counsel for the Defendants does not object to counsel for the
23
Plaintiff’s request, provided that the re-scheduled dates do not conflict with counsel’s trial
24
schedule.
25
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties jointly stipulate that they hereby request the Court to (1)
26
vacate the above-noted pre-trial and trial dates set forth in the Court’s July 3, 2012 Pre-Trial
27
Order (ECF No. 61); (2) set the start of pre-trial and trial dates to begin on or about August 1,
28
2013; and (3) set the time for (a) Exchange of Exhibits, (b) Submission of Joint Final Pre-Trial
-3-
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
EAST\54776709.2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CV 10-04475 EJD
1
Conference Statements, Motions in Limine, Voir Dire Questions, Proposed Jury Instructions and
2
Proposed Jury Verdict Forms, and (c) the Final Pre-Trial Conference in accordance with the new
3
trial date.
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
5
6
Dated: January 25, 2013
7
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
By
/s/Rachel Cowen
RACHEL B. COWEN
DLA Piper LLP (US)
203 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1900
Chicago, IL 60601
Tel: (312) 368-7044
Fax: (312) 251-5844
rachel.cowen@dlapiper.com
By
/s/Richard Glickman
RICHARD B. GLICKMAN
Richard B. Glickman A Professional
Corporation
1 Maritime Plaza, Suite 1600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (415) 362-7685
Fax: (415) 781-1034
Cell: (925) 368-6851
glickmanlawcorp@yahoo.com
8
9
10
11
12
13
Dated: January 25, 2013
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
-4EAST\54776709.2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CV 10-04475 EJD
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN JOSE DIVISION
4
LOAY S. NASER,
CASE NO. CV-10-04475-EJD
5
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
9
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY, METLIFE ENTERPRISE
GENERAL INSURANCE AGENCY,
INC., and METLIFE SECURITIES, INC.,
10
Honorable Edward J. Davila
XXXXXXXX
[PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES AS MODIFIED
BY THE COURT
Defendants.
8
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation to Modify Pre-Trial and Trial
Dates. Having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation, the Court hereby VACATES the dates set in the
July 3, 2012 Pre-Trial Order for (a) Exchange of Exhibits, (b) Submission of Joint Final Pre-Trial
Conference Statements, Motions in Limine, Voir Dire Questions, Proposed Jury Instructions and
Proposed Jury Verdict Forms, (c) the Final Pre-Trial Conference, and (d) Trial
The Court schedules this action for a Preliminary Pretrial Conference on March 1, 2013 at
11:00 a.m. The parties shall file a Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement on or before
February 22, 2013.
1/29/2013
Dated: ___________
22
_______________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
-5EAST\54776709.2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CV 10-04475 EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?