Rodarte v. Grounds

Filing 4

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/30/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2010)

Rodarte v. Grounds

Doc. 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Order to Show Cause P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.10\Rodarte517osc.wpd

*E-FILED - 11/30/10*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GUSTAVO RODARTE, Petitioner, vs. WARDEN R. GROUNDS, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 10-4517 RMW (PR) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging a disciplinary proceeding. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. The court orders respondent to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. BACKGROUND Petitioner claims in his petition that his due process rights were violated during disciplinary proceedings that stemmed from an incident on January 2, 2009. In the rules violation report (also known as a CDC 115), petitioner was charged with manipulating staff, in violation of California Code of Regulations, Title 15 § 3005(a). At a hearing on January 30, 2009, petitioner was found guilty. (Petition, Ex. D.) Petitioner requests that his rules violation be expunged from his record and that he be restored 30 days credit.

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. A. Standard of Review

DISCUSSION

This court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus "in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); Rose v. Hodges, 423 U.S. 19, 21 (1975). A district court shall "award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto." 28 U.S.C. § 2243. B. Petitioner's Claims As grounds for federal habeas relief petitioner claims that: (1) there was not "some evidence" to support guilty finding, and (2) he was denied his right to call witnesses at his disciplinary hearing. Liberally construed, petitioner's allegations are sufficient to require a response. The court orders respondent to show cause why the petition should not be granted. CONCLUSION The clerk shall serve by mail a copy of this order and the petition (docket no. 1)

and all attachments thereto upon the respondent and the respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California. The clerk shall also serve a copy of this order on the petitioner. 2. Respondent shall file with the court and serve on petitioner, within ninety days of

the date this order is filed, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. Respondent shall file with the answer and serve on petitioner a copy of all portions of the underlying state criminal record that have been transcribed previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the petition. If petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a traverse with the court and serving it on respondent within thirty days of the date the answer is filed. 3. Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an 2

Order to Show Cause P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.10\Rodarte517osc.wpd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases within ninety days of the date this order is filed. If respondent files such a motion, petitioner shall file with the court and serve on respondent an opposition or statement of nonopposition within thirty days of the date the motion is filed, and respondent shall file with the court and serve on petitioner a reply within fifteen days of the date any opposition is filed. 4. It is petitioner's responsibility to prosecute this case. Petitioner is reminded that

all communications with the court must be served on respondent by mailing a true copy of the document to respondent's counsel. Petitioner must keep the court and all parties informed of any change of address by filing a separate paper captioned "Notice of Change of Address." He must comply with the court's orders in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. 11/30/10 DATED: _______________ RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

Order to Show Cause P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.10\Rodarte517osc.wpd

3