Sharma et al v. Wachovia
Filing
45
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 Continuing Case Management Conference. Case management conference continued to 9/20/2011, 1:30 PM. Joint case management statement due by 9/13/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/1/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011)
1
Ali Nehme SBN 236360
2
Attorney At Law
P.O.Box 22278
3
4
5
6
*E-FILED 07-01-2011*
Telephone No.: 415-254-8235
Fax:
888-522-2957
Attorney for Plaintiffs
RAJ KUMARI SHARMA
and KARTARI LAL SHARMA
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
15
RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and KARTARI
LAL SHARMA
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WACHOVIA BANK, DOES 1-10, Inclusive,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:10-cv-04548-HRL
[PROPOSED]
============= ORDER ON
JOINT STIPULATION
REQUESTING CONTINUANCE
OF CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:
July 19, 2011
1: 30 p.m.
2
Hon. Howard R. Lloyd
[Re: Docket No. 44]
This Stipulation is entered into between Plaintiffs RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and KARTARI
LAL SHARMA (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, a division of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. erroneously sued as Wachovia Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”), by their undersigned counsel.
WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference is currently scheduled for Tuesday, July 19,
2011, at 1:30 p.m.
_______________________________________1________________________________________
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
2
WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Second
Amended Complaint on January 19, 2011.
3
4
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss and an Opposition to
Defendant’s Motion for Strike, on February 5, 2011.
5
WHEREAS, the Court took the matter under submission on March 29, no ruling on the
6
motions having been issued, and they are under submission.
7
WHEREAS, the pleadings are not yet set to allow for a productive Rule 26(f) conference.
8
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their respective counsel of
9
10
11
12
record, hereby agree and request this Court to vacate the Case Management Conference currently
scheduled for July 19, 2011, and reschedule it for September 20, 2011, after pleadings are set, or at a
later date convenient for the Court.
Respectfully Submitted
13
14
Dated:
June 27, 2011
CAMPBELL&TRYTTEN LLP
15
By: /s/ Fred Hickman_______
Fred Hickman
Attorney for Defendant
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE ,a division of WELLS
FARGO, N.A.,
16
17
18
19
ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN
Dated:
June 27, 2011
LAW OFFICES OF DEBORAH J. PIMENTEL
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
By: /s/ Ali Nehme__________
Ali Nehme
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and
KARTARI LAL SHARMA
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
I, Ali Nehme, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from
each of the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day, June 27, 2011.
/s/ Ali Nehme__________
Ali Nehme
_______________________________________2________________________________________
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
_
[PROPOSED]
===========ORDER
2
3
Having reviewed the Stipulation of Plaintiffs RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and
4
KARTARI LAL SHARMA (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant WACHOVIA (“Defendant”), and
5
6
7
8
good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Case Management Conference shall be
continued until September 20, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. The parties shall file a joint status report no later
than September 13, 2011.
9
10
11
12
13
Dated:
July 1, 2011
_____
___________________________________
United States Magistrate Judge
Howard R. Lloyd
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_______________________________________3________________________________________
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?