Sharma et al v. Wachovia

Filing 45

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 Continuing Case Management Conference. Case management conference continued to 9/20/2011, 1:30 PM. Joint case management statement due by 9/13/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/1/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011)

Download PDF
1 Ali Nehme SBN 236360 2 Attorney At Law P.O.Box 22278 3 4 5 6 *E-FILED 07-01-2011* Telephone No.: 415-254-8235 Fax: 888-522-2957 Attorney for Plaintiffs RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and KARTARI LAL SHARMA 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and KARTARI LAL SHARMA Plaintiffs, vs. WACHOVIA BANK, DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:10-cv-04548-HRL [PROPOSED] ============= ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Date: Time: Ctrm: Judge: July 19, 2011 1: 30 p.m. 2 Hon. Howard R. Lloyd [Re: Docket No. 44] This Stipulation is entered into between Plaintiffs RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and KARTARI LAL SHARMA (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. erroneously sued as Wachovia Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”), by their undersigned counsel. WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference is currently scheduled for Tuesday, July 19, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. _______________________________________1________________________________________ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint on January 19, 2011. 3 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss and an Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Strike, on February 5, 2011. 5 WHEREAS, the Court took the matter under submission on March 29, no ruling on the 6 motions having been issued, and they are under submission. 7 WHEREAS, the pleadings are not yet set to allow for a productive Rule 26(f) conference. 8 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their respective counsel of 9 10 11 12 record, hereby agree and request this Court to vacate the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for July 19, 2011, and reschedule it for September 20, 2011, after pleadings are set, or at a later date convenient for the Court. Respectfully Submitted 13 14 Dated: June 27, 2011 CAMPBELL&TRYTTEN LLP 15 By: /s/ Fred Hickman_______ Fred Hickman Attorney for Defendant WACHOVIA MORTGAGE ,a division of WELLS FARGO, N.A., 16 17 18 19 ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN Dated: June 27, 2011 LAW OFFICES OF DEBORAH J. PIMENTEL 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ Ali Nehme__________ Ali Nehme Attorneys for Plaintiffs RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and KARTARI LAL SHARMA ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Ali Nehme, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day, June 27, 2011. /s/ Ali Nehme__________ Ali Nehme _______________________________________2________________________________________ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 _ [PROPOSED] ===========ORDER 2 3 Having reviewed the Stipulation of Plaintiffs RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and 4 KARTARI LAL SHARMA (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant WACHOVIA (“Defendant”), and 5 6 7 8 good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Case Management Conference shall be continued until September 20, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. The parties shall file a joint status report no later than September 13, 2011. 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: July 1, 2011 _____ ___________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _______________________________________3________________________________________ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?