Sharma et al v. Wachovia

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 47 Continuing Case Management Conference. Case management conference continued to 12/6/2011, 1:30 PM. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/29/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/29/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 Ali Nehme SBN 236360 *E-FILED 08-29-2011* Attorney At Law P.O.Box 22278 Telephone No.: 415-254-8235 Fax: 888-522-2957 4 5 6 Attorney for Plaintiffs RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and KARTARI LAL SHARMA 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and KARTARI LAL SHARMA Plaintiffs, vs. WACHOVIA BANK, DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:10-cv-04548-HRL ============= [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Date: Time: Ctrm: Judge: September 20 , 2011 1: 30 p.m. 2 Hon. Howard R. Lloyd [Re: Docket No. 47] 23 This Stipulation is entered into between Plaintiffs RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and 24 KARTARI LAL SHARMA (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, a division 25 of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. erroneously sued as Wachovia Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”), by their 26 undersigned counsel. 27 28 WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference is currently scheduled for September 20, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 1 2 WHEREAS, Defendants Motion to Dismiss has been granted on August 26, 2011 with Plaintiffs given 14 days to amend. 3 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs intend to file an amended complaint within 14 days from the date of the Court’s Order. 5 6 WHEREAS, Defendants intend to file a Motion to Dismiss in response to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. 7 WHEREAS, the pleadings are not yet set to allow for a productive Rule 26(f) conference. 8 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their respective counsel 9 of record, hereby agree and request this Court to vacate the Case Management Conference 10 currently scheduled for September 20, 2011, and rescheduled it for December 6, 2011, after 11 12 pleadings are set, or at a later date convenient for the Court. Respectfully Submitted 13 14 Dated: August 26, 2011 ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN CAMPBELL&TRYTTEN LLP 15 16 By: /s/ Fred Hickman_______ Fred Hickman Attorney for Defendant WACHOVIA MORTGAGE ,a division of WELLS FARGO, N.A., 17 18 19 20 Dated: August 26, 2011 LAW OFFICES OF DEBORAH J. PIMENTEL 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 By: /s/ Ali Nehme__________ Ali Nehme Attorneys for Plaintiffs RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and KARTARI LAL SHARMA ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Ali Nehme, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day, August 26, 2011. /s/ Ali Nehme 28 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 2 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ============ 2 Having reviewed the Stipulation of Plaintiffs RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and 3 4 KARTARI LAL SHARMA (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant WACHOVIA (“Defendant”), and 5 good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Case Management Conference shall be 6 continued until December 6, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. The parties shall file a joint status report no later 7 than November 29, 2011. 8 9 10 11 Dated: August 29, 2011 _____ ___________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 12 Howard R. Lloyd 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?