Sharma et al v. Wachovia
Filing
48
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 47 Continuing Case Management Conference. Case management conference continued to 12/6/2011, 1:30 PM. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/29/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/29/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2011)
1
2
3
Ali Nehme SBN 236360
*E-FILED 08-29-2011*
Attorney At Law
P.O.Box 22278
Telephone No.: 415-254-8235
Fax:
888-522-2957
4
5
6
Attorney for Plaintiffs
RAJ KUMARI SHARMA
and KARTARI LAL SHARMA
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
15
RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and KARTARI
LAL SHARMA
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WACHOVIA BANK, DOES 1-10, Inclusive,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:10-cv-04548-HRL
=============
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON
JOINT STIPULATION
REQUESTING CONTINUANCE
OF CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:
September 20 , 2011
1: 30 p.m.
2
Hon. Howard R. Lloyd
[Re: Docket No. 47]
23
This Stipulation is entered into between Plaintiffs RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and
24
KARTARI LAL SHARMA (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, a division
25
of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. erroneously sued as Wachovia Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”), by their
26
undersigned counsel.
27
28
WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference is currently scheduled for September 20,
2011, at 1:30 p.m.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
1
2
WHEREAS, Defendants Motion to Dismiss has been granted on August 26, 2011 with
Plaintiffs given 14 days to amend.
3
4
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs intend to file an amended complaint within 14 days from the date
of the Court’s Order.
5
6
WHEREAS, Defendants intend to file a Motion to Dismiss in response to Plaintiffs’
Amended Complaint.
7
WHEREAS, the pleadings are not yet set to allow for a productive Rule 26(f) conference.
8
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their respective counsel
9
of record, hereby agree and request this Court to vacate the Case Management Conference
10
currently scheduled for September 20, 2011, and rescheduled it for December 6, 2011, after
11
12
pleadings are set, or at a later date convenient for the Court.
Respectfully Submitted
13
14
Dated: August 26, 2011
ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN
CAMPBELL&TRYTTEN LLP
15
16
By: /s/ Fred Hickman_______
Fred Hickman
Attorney for Defendant
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE ,a division of WELLS
FARGO, N.A.,
17
18
19
20
Dated:
August 26, 2011
LAW OFFICES OF DEBORAH J. PIMENTEL
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
By: /s/ Ali Nehme__________
Ali Nehme
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and
KARTARI LAL SHARMA
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
I, Ali Nehme, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained
from each of the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United
States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day, August 26, 2011.
/s/ Ali Nehme
28
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
2
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
============
2
Having reviewed the Stipulation of Plaintiffs RAJ KUMARI SHARMA and
3
4
KARTARI LAL SHARMA (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant WACHOVIA (“Defendant”), and
5
good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Case Management Conference shall be
6
continued until December 6, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. The parties shall file a joint status report no later
7
than November 29, 2011.
8
9
10
11
Dated:
August 29, 2011
_____
___________________________________
United States Magistrate Judge
12
Howard R. Lloyd
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?