Ogawa v. Rieadco Corporation

Filing 36

ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the April 4 Conference. The Court will set a new Conference date in its Order addressing the pending Motion, if necessary. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/30/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2011)

Download PDF
Ogawa v. Rieadco Corporation Doc. 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 The United States of America, ex rel. Richard T. Ogawa, Plaintiff, For the Northern District of California IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 10-04578 JW ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 v. Rieadco Corp., Defendant. / This case is scheduled for a Case Management Conference on April 4, 2011. Defendant has 16 17 In light of the pending dispositive Motion, the Court finds that a Case Management Conference is 18 premature at this time. 19 Accordingly, the Court VACATES the April 4 Conference. The Court will set a new 20 Conference date in its Order addressing the pending Motion, if necessary. 21 22 23 Dated: March 30, 2011 24 25 26 27 28 (Defendant's Amended Notice and Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue, Docket Item No. 21.) 1 filed a Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue set for hearing on April 4, 2011.1 JAMES WARE United States District Chief Judge Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Jeremy Michael Duggan jduggan@beckross.com Kenneth Cleon Brooks kcb@brookspatents.com Ronald Craig Finley rfinley@beckross.com Dated: March 30, 2011 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?