DeSantis v. International Business Machines Corporation et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 34 , Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/18/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 LESLIE HOLMES (SB# 192608) leslie@hulawyers.com HOLMES & USOZ LLP 333 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 805 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 292-7600 Facsimile: (408) 292-7611 Attorney for Plaintiff MICHAEL DESANTIS 6 7 8 9 10 E. JEFFREY GRUBE (SB# 167324) jeffgrube@paulhastings.com JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI (SB# 248073) jeffmichalowski@paulhastings.com PAUL HASTINGS LLP 55 Second Street, Twenty-Fourth Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 11 Attorneys for Defendants 12 13 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION and GARY ROBINSON 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN JOSE DIVISION 17 18 MICHAEL DESANTIS, an individual, Plaintiff, 19 vs. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 10-CV-4602-JF STIPULATION AND -----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, a corporation; GARY ROBINSON, an individual, Defendant. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, a corporation; Counterclaimant, vs. MICHAEL DESANTIS, an individual, Counter-Defendant. Case No. 10-CV-4602-JF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 1 2 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 3 The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 4 Court Processes: 5  Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 6  Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 7  Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 8 Private Process: 9  10 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Private mediation before a mediator agreed to by the parties. 11 The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 12  13 14 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)  15 other requested deadline Within 90 days from the date of Plaintiff’s deposition, currently noticed for September 8, 2011. 16 17 DATED: August 15, 2011 18 19 LESLIE HOLMES HOLMES AND USOZ LLP By: /s/ Leslie Holmes LESLIE HOLMES 20 Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael DeSantis 21 22 DATED: August 15, 2011 23 E. JEFFREY GRUBE JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI PAUL HASTINGS LLP 24 By: 25 26 /s/ Jeffrey P. Michalowski JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI Attorneys for Defendants INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION and GARY ROBINSON 27 28 -1Case No. 10-CV-4602-JF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS ------------------ ORDER [PROPOSED] 1 2 Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 3 4 5 6  Non-binding Arbitration  Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)  Mediation X  Private mediation before a mediator agreed to by the parties. 7 Deadline for ADR session 8 9  90 days from the date of this order. X  Within 60 days from the date upon which both parties have completed at 10 least one deposition. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 18 DATED: August ___, 2011 14 15 Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge 16 17 LEGAL_US_W # 68840285.1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Case No. 10-CV-4602-JF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?