UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Wilson et al
Filing
42
ORDER APPROVING 41 STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/16/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2011)
6
MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
THOMAS MOORE (ASBN 4305-O78T)
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Tax Division
CYNTHIA STIER (DCBN 423256)
Assistant United States Attorney
11th Floor Federal Building
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: (415) 436-7000
7
Attorneys for the United States of America
1
2
3
4
5
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
v.
THOMAS WILSON AND MARGO
ALEXANDER; STATE OF
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX
BOARD,
16
Defendants.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. C-10-04656-EJD
AMENDED STIPULATION FOR
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ORDER
The parties, United States of America and Defendants, Thomas Wilson and Margo
19
Alexander, agree as evidenced by the signature of their attorney below, subject to the Court’s
20
approval, as follows:
21
1.
That judgment may be entered in favor of the United States and against
22
Defendants, Thomas Wilson and Margo Alexander, for their delinquent 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998,
23
1999, 2000 and 2001 federal income tax liabilities, plus related penalties and interest, in the
24
amount of $2,423,570.91, as of March 10, 2011, plus interest accruing after March 10, 2011,
25
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1961(c) until fully paid.
26
2.
That the judgment referred to above, shall encumber all interests of Defendants,
27
Thomas Wilson and Margo Alexander, including their interest in the real property that is the
28
subject of this action, commonly referred to as 333 Summit Road, Watsonville, California
1
(“Watsonville Property”), situated in the County of Santa Cruz, State of California, and is more
2
particularly described as follows:
3
Subject to any conflicts in boundary lines, or discrepancies that would be revealed by a correct
4
survey, the land referred to in this report is situated in the County shown herein, in the State of
5
California and is more particularly described as follows:
6
Being a portion of the Rancho Salsipuedes in the California Republic, and being more
particularly described as follows:
7
8
9
Beginning at a one inch iron pipe at the intersection of the Southwesterly line of
Summit Road with the Southeasterly line of the lands of Charles R. Brundage, Inc., as
described in Volume 1724 of Official Records, page 670, and the Northwesterly line
of the lands of Donald McKay as described in Volume 1277 of Official Records, page
460, Santa Cruz County Records;
10
11
*thence South 29° 18' 42" West 1031.00 feet to a one inch iron pipe on the above
mentioned line between Charles R. Brundage, Inc., and Donald McKay;
12
*thence leaving said line North 64° 03' West 423.32 feet to a one inch iron pipe;
13
*thence North 29° 18' 42" East 1031.00 feet to a one inch iron pipe on the
Southwesterly line of Summit Road;
14
15
*thence along the Southwesterly line Summit Road 423.32 feet to the place of
beginning.
16
3. The United States of America agrees to not foreclose this judgment lien against
17
the Watsonville property, which is currently being used by Defendants, Thomas Wilson and
18
Margo Alexander, as their personal residence, until the earlier of: (a) August 1, 2016; (b) the
19
time at which the aforesaid real property is no longer used as the personal residence of
20
Defendants, Thomas Wilson and Margo Alexander; (c) failing to comply with the terms of
21
paragraph 4, below; or (d) upon the death of Thomas Wilson, upon which then the United States
22
would enforce the judgment against the subject property by selling it at public auction according
23
to law, with the proceeds to be applied to the remaining balance of the judgment, without
24
necessity of any further order of this court.
25
4. In exchange, Defendants, Thomas Wilson and Margo Alexander, agree to keep the
26
property fully insured, not to encumber the property, to keep the property properly maintained,
27
and all real estate taxes on it paid while used as their personal residence.
28
5. Defendants, Thomas Wilson and Margo Alexander, shall provide proof of
Amended Stipulation For Entry of Jmt &
[Proposed] Order (No. C-10-04656-EJD)
2
1
insurance and the payment of all real estate taxes on the 1st of September, 2011, 2012, 2013,
2
2014, 2015. Said proof of insurance and payment of all real estate taxes shall be made to the
3
following address:
4
5
6
Office of the United States Attorney
Attn: FLU Unit
9th Floor Federal Building
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: (415) 436-7200
7
8
6. Failure to provide proof of insurance and the payment of all real estate taxes, as
9
described in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, shall be grounds to void the United States’ promise to not
10
foreclose its judgment lien on the Watsonville property until any of the conditions specified in
11
paragraph 3(a), (b), (c) or (d) above, and all parties stipulate and agree that failure to provide
12
said proof shall be grounds to immediately foreclose this judgment lien without the necessity of
13
any further order of this Court.
14
7. The parties agree to bear his or her own costs and fees.
15
8. The Court retains jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the terms of the
16
settlement between the parties as set forth above.
17
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
18
Dated: September 15, 2011
/s/ Cynthia Stier
CYNTHIA STIER
Counsel for United States
Dated: September 15, 2011
/s/ David Kirsch
DAVID M. KIRSCH
Attorney At Law
Ten Almaden Blvd., Suite 1250
San Jose, CA 95113-2233
Phone (408) 298-5500
Attorney for Thomas Wilson and
Margo Alexander
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SO ORDERED.
26
27
September 16, 2011
Dated:_________________
28
Amended Stipulation For Entry of Jmt &
[Proposed] Order (No. C-10-04656-EJD)
______________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?