UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Wilson et al

Filing 42

ORDER APPROVING 41 STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/16/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2011)

Download PDF
6 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney THOMAS MOORE (ASBN 4305-O78T) Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division CYNTHIA STIER (DCBN 423256) Assistant United States Attorney 11th Floor Federal Building 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7000 7 Attorneys for the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 v. THOMAS WILSON AND MARGO ALEXANDER; STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, 16 Defendants. 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C-10-04656-EJD AMENDED STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ORDER The parties, United States of America and Defendants, Thomas Wilson and Margo 19 Alexander, agree as evidenced by the signature of their attorney below, subject to the Court’s 20 approval, as follows: 21 1. That judgment may be entered in favor of the United States and against 22 Defendants, Thomas Wilson and Margo Alexander, for their delinquent 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 23 1999, 2000 and 2001 federal income tax liabilities, plus related penalties and interest, in the 24 amount of $2,423,570.91, as of March 10, 2011, plus interest accruing after March 10, 2011, 25 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1961(c) until fully paid. 26 2. That the judgment referred to above, shall encumber all interests of Defendants, 27 Thomas Wilson and Margo Alexander, including their interest in the real property that is the 28 subject of this action, commonly referred to as 333 Summit Road, Watsonville, California 1 (“Watsonville Property”), situated in the County of Santa Cruz, State of California, and is more 2 particularly described as follows: 3 Subject to any conflicts in boundary lines, or discrepancies that would be revealed by a correct 4 survey, the land referred to in this report is situated in the County shown herein, in the State of 5 California and is more particularly described as follows: 6 Being a portion of the Rancho Salsipuedes in the California Republic, and being more particularly described as follows: 7 8 9 Beginning at a one inch iron pipe at the intersection of the Southwesterly line of Summit Road with the Southeasterly line of the lands of Charles R. Brundage, Inc., as described in Volume 1724 of Official Records, page 670, and the Northwesterly line of the lands of Donald McKay as described in Volume 1277 of Official Records, page 460, Santa Cruz County Records; 10 11 *thence South 29° 18' 42" West 1031.00 feet to a one inch iron pipe on the above mentioned line between Charles R. Brundage, Inc., and Donald McKay; 12 *thence leaving said line North 64° 03' West 423.32 feet to a one inch iron pipe; 13 *thence North 29° 18' 42" East 1031.00 feet to a one inch iron pipe on the Southwesterly line of Summit Road; 14 15 *thence along the Southwesterly line Summit Road 423.32 feet to the place of beginning. 16 3. The United States of America agrees to not foreclose this judgment lien against 17 the Watsonville property, which is currently being used by Defendants, Thomas Wilson and 18 Margo Alexander, as their personal residence, until the earlier of: (a) August 1, 2016; (b) the 19 time at which the aforesaid real property is no longer used as the personal residence of 20 Defendants, Thomas Wilson and Margo Alexander; (c) failing to comply with the terms of 21 paragraph 4, below; or (d) upon the death of Thomas Wilson, upon which then the United States 22 would enforce the judgment against the subject property by selling it at public auction according 23 to law, with the proceeds to be applied to the remaining balance of the judgment, without 24 necessity of any further order of this court. 25 4. In exchange, Defendants, Thomas Wilson and Margo Alexander, agree to keep the 26 property fully insured, not to encumber the property, to keep the property properly maintained, 27 and all real estate taxes on it paid while used as their personal residence. 28 5. Defendants, Thomas Wilson and Margo Alexander, shall provide proof of Amended Stipulation For Entry of Jmt & [Proposed] Order (No. C-10-04656-EJD) 2 1 insurance and the payment of all real estate taxes on the 1st of September, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2 2014, 2015. Said proof of insurance and payment of all real estate taxes shall be made to the 3 following address: 4 5 6 Office of the United States Attorney Attn: FLU Unit 9th Floor Federal Building 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7200 7 8 6. Failure to provide proof of insurance and the payment of all real estate taxes, as 9 described in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, shall be grounds to void the United States’ promise to not 10 foreclose its judgment lien on the Watsonville property until any of the conditions specified in 11 paragraph 3(a), (b), (c) or (d) above, and all parties stipulate and agree that failure to provide 12 said proof shall be grounds to immediately foreclose this judgment lien without the necessity of 13 any further order of this Court. 14 7. The parties agree to bear his or her own costs and fees. 15 8. The Court retains jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the terms of the 16 settlement between the parties as set forth above. 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 18 Dated: September 15, 2011 /s/ Cynthia Stier CYNTHIA STIER Counsel for United States Dated: September 15, 2011 /s/ David Kirsch DAVID M. KIRSCH Attorney At Law Ten Almaden Blvd., Suite 1250 San Jose, CA 95113-2233 Phone (408) 298-5500 Attorney for Thomas Wilson and Margo Alexander 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SO ORDERED. 26 27 September 16, 2011 Dated:_________________ 28 Amended Stipulation For Entry of Jmt & [Proposed] Order (No. C-10-04656-EJD) ______________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?