Silicon Turnkey Solutions, Inc v. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc et al

Filing 19

ORDER Approving 18 Stipulation as Modified by the Court. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 21, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2011)

Silicon Turnkey Solutions, Inc v. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc et al

Doc. 19

I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Joanne Carlson (State Bar No. 160898) Attorney at Law 500 Lincoln Street Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail] Attorney for Plaintiff Silicon Turkey Solutions Inc. Merton Howard (Bar No. 161125) Hanson Bridgett LLP 425 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]

[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. and Thermo Keytek LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SILICON TURNKEY SOLUTIONS INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff,
V.

No. CVI 0-4715PSG STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND TO EXTEND THE TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT

THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC, a Delaware corporation, THERMO KEYTEK LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and DOES 1-10, Defendants.

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. Cvi O-4715PSG)

2918804.1

Dockets.Justia.com

I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Date:

Plaintiff Silicon Turnkey Solutions. Inc. ("STS") and Defendants Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. ("Thermo Fisher") and Thermo Keytek LLC ("Thermo Keytek"), by and between their respective counsel, stipulate to the following: 1. That the Case Management Conference set in the captioned action on

March 29, 2011, be continued for thirty (30) days, or as soon thereafter as may be allowed; and 2. That the Defendants' current deadline of March 28, 2011, to respond to the

Complaint in the captioned action be extended to April 27, 2011. Such extension and continuance are necessary to facilitate the discussions between Plaintiff and Defendants regarding resolution of this action. The parties have reached an agreement in principle. Judicial economy will be served in that the requested extension of time is necessary to finalize the agreement and prepare for dismissal of the action. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter the accompanying proposed order. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Date: f1)cz4_A W-2011 0nne Carlson Attorney for Plaintiff Silicon Turnkey Solutions, Inc A

/li /JL

1k

21) Merton Howard / Hanson Bridgett LLP Attorneys for Defendants Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. and Thermo Keytek LLC

-2STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. CV1O-4715PSG)
29188041

I

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16
Dated: 3/21/2011 3/21/2011

ORDER The Court, having reviewed the above Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference and Extend the Time to Respond to Complaint, HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: The Case Management Conference, previously scheduled for March 29, 2011, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5 4th Floor, of the U.S. District Court, 280 South 1st Street, San xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Jose, CA, shall be continued at least thirty (30) days to April 26, 2011 at 2 p.m. Defendants' deadline to respond to the Complaint in the captioned action is extended to xxxxxxx April xxxxxxxx 19, 2011. 27, 2011. No further extensions will be granted. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Paul S. Grewal

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
-3STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. Cvi O-4715PSG)
2918804.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CASE NO. CV10-4715P5G)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 18, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing: STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND TO EXTEND THE TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court, Northern District of California by using the designated CM/ECF system.

I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system.

Dated: March 18, 2011 W Bridg'e Marie011ber n 'tte

2920225.1