Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Robert Morgan Enterprises
Filing
50
ORDER CONTINUING JUDGMENT DEBTOR EXAM. Judgment Debtor Exam set for 7/9/2012 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge James Ware on May 30,2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
NO. C 10-04757 JW
Equal Emp’t Opportunity Comm’n,
11
ORDER CONTINUING JUDGMENT
DEBTOR EXAMINATION
Plaintiff,
v.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Robert Morgan Enters.,
13
Defendant.
14
/
15
On March 29, 2012, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for a judgment debtor
16
examination of Robert V. Morgan, Jr. (See Docket Item No. 46.) On April 17, 2012, the Court
17
granted a stipulation by the parties to continue the judgment debtor examination to July 2, 2012 at 9
18
a.m. (See Docket Item No. 49.)
19
Upon review, and in light of the Court’s own calendar and availability, the Court
20
CONTINUES the July 2 judgment debtor examination to July 9, 2012 at 9 a.m. Plaintiff shall serve
21
this Order on Defendant by June 11, 2012 and file the appropriate certificate of service.
22
23
Dated: May 30, 2012
24
25
26
27
28
JAMES WARE
United States District Chief Judge
1
2
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:
3
Cindy O’Hara cindy.ohara@eeoc.gov
David F. Offen-Brown David.Offen-Brown@eeoc.gov
Jonathan T. Peck Jonathan.Peck@eeoc.gov
Raymond T. Cheung raymond.cheung@eeoc.gov
Steven Allan Clair steveclair57@yahoo.com
William Robert Tamayo william.tamayo@eeoc.gov
4
5
6
7
Dated: May 30, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
8
By:
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ JW Chambers
William Noble
Courtroom Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?