Siano Mobile Silicon, Inc v. Mavcom, Inc et al

Filing 80

ORDER re 79 Adopting Parties' Stipulation in Part. The April 28, 2011 motion hearing and Case Management Conference are continued to June 2, 2011 at 1:30PM. Signed by Judge Koh on 3/7/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2011)

Siano Mobile Silicon, Inc v. Mavcom, Inc et al

Doc. 80

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SIANO MOBILE SILICON, INC., Plaintiff, v. MAVCOM, INC., ET AL., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 10-CV-04783-LHK ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' STIPULATION IN PART AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE (re: Dkt. #79)

On March 1, 2011, the Honorable Paul S. Grewal issued an Order granting Plaintiff's renewed motion to conduct limited discovery regarding personal jurisdiction. See Dkt. #78. On March 4, 2011, in light of Judge Grewal's Order, the parties submitted a proposed revised briefing schedule in connection with Defendants' pending motion to dismiss. See Dkt. #79. The parties request an Opposition deadline of April 21, 2011, a Reply deadline of May 13, 2011, and a continuance of the motion hearing and Case Management Conference from April 28, 2011 to June 2, 2011. The parties' proposed schedule is ADOPTED IN PART. Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #62] is now due by Friday, April 15, 2011. Any Reply by Defendants is now due by Wednesday, May 4, 2011. The hearing on Defendants' motion to dismiss is now set for Thursday, June 2, 2011 at 1:30 p.m., with a Case Management Conference to follow. The motion hearing and Case Management Conference currently set for April 28, 2011 are both vacated. 1
Case No.: 10-CV-04783-LHK ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' STIPULATION IN PART AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The previously adopted page-limitations remain in effect. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Opposition shall not exceed 37 pages, and Defendants' Reply shall not exceed 15 pages. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 7, 2011

_________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge

2
Case No.: 10-CV-04783-LHK ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' STIPULATION IN PART AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE