In re Google Referrer Header Privacy Litigation

Filing 25

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Judge James Ware no longer assigned to the case.Signed by The Executive Committee on 4/25/2011. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2011)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

***********
CASE NO: 5-10-cv-04809-JW
CASE TITLE: Gaos v. Google Inc.

REASSIGNMENT ORDER
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the Honorable Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings.
1. All future filings shall bear the new initials EJD immediately after the case number.
2. Until further notice, all subsequent hearings shall be held in Courtroom 1 on the 5th Floor
of the United States Courthouse, 280 S. 1st Street, San Jose, California.
3. All matters previously referred to a magistrate judge shall remain before that magistrate
judge.
4. Cases previously referred to an ADR process (at filing, by order of the previously
assigned judge or by stipulation and order) shall proceed under the terms of the applicable
ADR local rule. Dates for previously scheduled ADR telephone conferences shall remain in
effect.
5. All discovery cutoff dates and other deadlines associated with the case, such as disclosure
and expert deadlines, shall remain in effect.
6. All Status and Case Management Conference dates are VACATED and will be reset by
the Court.
7. Except for those already set before a magistrate judge, all other pending motions are
terminated, and all other law and motion hearing dates are VACATED. A moving party shall
withdraw and renotice all pending motions after contacting Elizabeth C. Garcia, Judge
Davila's Courtroom Deputy, at [phone], to obtain an available Friday at 9:00 AM for
hearing. Upon resetting, all documents previously filed regarding the motion must be refiled
on ECF. Each party shall submit to the Clerk one two-hole punched paper copy of all
documents filed by that party, marked as a duplicate for the chambers of Judge Davila. As
dates fall due for any further responsive documents, they should be filed in accordance with
the local rules and standing orders.
8. All pretrial conference and trial dates currently set for dates before September 1, 2011 are
VACATED. All discovery cutoff dates and other deadlines associated with the case remain in

effect.

9. All pretrial conference and trial dates currently set for dates on or after September 1, 2011, as
well as other deadlines associated with the case, remain in effect, unless and until otherwise
ordered by the Court.
10. In addition to the foregoing, within ten (10) days of today’s date, all parties shall file a Joint
Case Management Statement (separate statements are appropriate if either party is proceeding
without counsel). The Statement should not exceed ten pages in length and should address the
following items in the following order:
a. Date case was filed;
b. List or description of all parties;
c. Summary of all claims, counter-claims, cross-claims, and/or third party claims;
d. Brief description of the event underlying the action;
e. Description of relief sought and damages claimed with an explanation as to how
damages are computed;
f.

Status of discovery (including any limits or cutoff dates);

g. Procedural history of the case including previous motions decided and/or submitted,
ADR proceedings or settlement conferences scheduled or concluded, appellate
proceedings pending or concluded, and any previous referral to a magistrate judge;
h. Other deadlines in place (before reassignment), including those for dispositive motions,
pretrial conferences, and trials;
i.

Any requested modification of these dates and reason for the request;

j.

Whether the parties will consent to a magistrate judge for trial; and

k. If there exists an immediate need for a case management conference to be scheduled in
the action.
11. When the Court sets an initial or subsequent Case Management Conference, all parties
must file a Joint Case Management Statement or Subsequent Case Management Statement in
compliance with the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California re:
Contents of Joint Case Management Statement and Civil L.R. 16-9 and 16-10.
12. Should counsel need to contact the Court regarding this Order, please contact Elizabeth
Garcia, Judge Davila’s Courtroom Deputy, at [phone].

Dated:

April 25, 2011

FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:

________________________
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

2

Copies to all parties