In re Google Referrer Header Privacy Litigation
Filing
36
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d filed byGoogle Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Statement of Recent Decision)(Related document(s) #29 ) (Edwards, Randall) (Filed on 11/16/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
RANDALL W. EDWARDS (S.B. #179053)
redwards@omm.com
SAMUEL ZUN (S.B. #264930)
szun@omm.com
O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Telephone:
(415) 984-8700
Facsimile:
(415) 984-8701
Attorneys for Defendant
Google Inc.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
PALOMA GAOS,
13
Case No. 10-cv-04809-EJD
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
GOOGLE INC.,
16
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
Hearing Date: Oct. 28, 2011
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Place: Courtroom 1, 5th Floor
Judge: Hon. Edward J. Davila
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION 10CV-04809-EJD
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(d)(2), and in connection with its Motion to Dismiss
2
Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, Docket No. 29, Defendant Google Inc. hereby submits the
3
attached recent decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
4
in Low v. LinkedIn Corp., Case No. 11-cv-01468-LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 11, 2011), in which the
5
court granted defendant LinkedIn Corp.’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to
6
Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of Article III standing. A true and correct copy of the court’s order
7
granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss is attached as Exhibit A.
8
9
Dated: November 16, 2011
O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
10
11
12
13
By:
/s/ Randall W. Edwards
Randall W. Edwards
Attorneys for Defendant
Google Inc.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION 10CV-04809-EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?