Gaos v. Google Inc.

Filing 79

ORDER GRANTING 77 Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/25/2014. (Correction of 77 PDF) (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 5 In re GOOGLE REFERRER HEADER PRIVACY 6 LITIGATION 7 8 _______________________________________ This Document Relates To: All Actions 9 10 11 12 13 Case No. 5:10-cv-04809-EJD CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] XXXXXXXX ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OVERSIZED REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES, AND INCENTIVE AWARD Hon. Edward J. Davila 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EXCESS PAGES CASE NO. 5:10-cv-04809-EJD The Court has considered the Administrative Motion of Plaintiffs Gaos, Italiano, and 1 2 Priyev for an Order granting them leave to file a Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ 3 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees, 4 Expenses, and Incentive Awards in excess of fifteen (15) pages and the Parties’ stipulation for 5 such relief. Good cause shown, the Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiffs shall have leave to file a 6 7 memorandum in excess of fifteen (15) pages, and shall be permitted to file a Reply Memorandum 8 in Support of Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Motion for Award of 9 Attorneys’ Fees, Expenses, and Incentive Awards that is up to twenty-five (25) pages in length. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Date: ________________________________ HONORABLE EDWARD J. DAVILA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8/25/2014 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EXCESS PAGES 1 CASE NO. 5:10-cv-04809-EJD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?