Art of Living Foundation v. Does 1-10

Filing 183

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting (180) Stipulation in cases 5:10-cv-05022-LHK and 5:12-cv-02748-LHK Dismissing with Prejudice.Associated Cases: 5:10-cv-05022-LHK, 5:12-cv-02748-LHK(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)

Case5:10-cv-05022-LHK Document180 Filed07/02/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6

Joshua Koltun (Bar No. 173040)
Attorney
101 California Street
Suite 2450, No. 500
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 866.462.5959
[e-mail]
Attorney for Defendants
Doe/Klim and Doe/Skywalker

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

10
11
12

ART OF LIVING FOUNDATION, a
California corporation,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19

ART OF LIVING FOUNDATION, a
California corporation,

20

Plaintiff,

21

v.

22

ENG-AN CHOU,

23

Defendants.

24
25
26

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Case No.: CV 10-5022-LHK-HRL

Case No: 12-CV 02748 LHK

27
28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

CV 10-5022-LHK-HRL

Case5:10-cv-05022-LHK Document180 Filed07/02/12 Page2 of 2

1

WHEREAS, on June 12, 2012, Plaintiff Art of Living Foundation and Defendants Klim and

2

Skywalker (Parties) conducted a successful settlement conference before the Honorable Joseph C.

3

Spero in Art of Living Foundation v. Does, Case No. 10-cv-5022 LHK (“Doe Action”);

4

WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a settlement agreement, which was placed on the Court’s

5

records on June 12, 2012, whereby, among other things, Skywalker would dismiss with prejudice the

6

appeal of the Doe Action and Plaintiff would dismiss with prejudice both the Doe Action and the

7

complaint in Art of Living Foundation v. Eng-An Chou, Case No. 12- 02748-LHK (“Chou Action”);

8

WHEREAS, Parties stipulate and agree and respectfully request the Court to order as follows:

9

1. The action Art of Living Foundation v. Does, Case No. 10-cv-5022 LHK is DISMISSED

10
11
12

WITH PREJUDICE;
2. The action Art of Living Foundation v. Eng-An Chou, Case No. 12- 02748-LHK is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

13

3. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees associated with both the Doe Action

14

and the Chou Action, except for attorney’s fees in the amount of $250,000 that Plaintiff

15

Art of Living Foundation agreed to pay to attorney Joshua Koltun as part of the settlement

16

agreement.

17

4. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action to enforce the settlement agreement

18

between the Parties, which includes but is not limited to the “freezing” of the two blogs at

19

issue in the Doe Action and Chou Action.

20

Dated: June 29, 2012

________\s\____________
Karl Kronenberger
Attorney for Plaintiff
Art of Living Foundation

Dated: June 29, 2012

________\s\____________
Joshua Koltun
Attorney for Defendants
Doe Klim and Doe Skywalker

21
22
23
24
25

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk shall close the file.
26
27

Dated: July 9, 2012

28

____________________________
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
-1-

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

CV 10 – 5022 LHK-HRL