Weber v. Google, Inc.

Filing 5

Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint re ( 1 ) by Google, Inc.. (Edwards, Randall) (Filed on 12/23/2010) Linkage added on 12/27/2010 (bw, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RANDALL W. EDWARDS (S.B. #179053) redwards@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION JASON WEBER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. Case No. CV 10-5035-HRL STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Date Filed: November 5, 2010 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME CV 10-5035-HRL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties to this action stipulate that Defendant Google Inc. shall have until January 28, 2011, to respond to the complaint filed by Plaintiff Jason Weber on November 5, 2010, which was served on December 7, 2010. The stipulated extension of time will not affect the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order in the case. Dated: December 23, 2010 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: /s/ Randall W. Edwards Randall W. Edwards Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. Dated: December 23, 2010 KAMBERLAW, LLP By: /s/ Avi Kreitenberg Avi Kreitenberg Attorneys for Plaintiff Jason Weber Filer's Attestation: In compliance with General Order 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation has been obtained from Avi Kreitenberg. Dated: December 23, 2010 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP /s/ Randall W. Edwards Randall W. Edwards Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. By: -2- STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME CV 10-5035-HRL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?