Johnson v. Fishback et al
Filing
45
ORDER re Settlement. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 7/12/2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
TYRONE JOHNSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
DAVID FISHBACK; M. CARRIZOSA,
)
BADGE NO. S042; JOHN DOE and RICHARD )
ROE, individually and in their capacities as Los )
Gatos police officers, the true names and exact )
numbers of whom are unknown at this time;
)
SCOTT SEAMAN; TOWN OF LOS GATOS, a )
municipal corporation; DOES 1 to 10,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No.: 10-CV-05084-LHK
ORDER RE SETTLEMENT
On July 11, 2012, Plaintiff informed the Court that he had entered into a full settlement
21
with all defendants in this matter. ECF No. 44. A pretrial conference in this matter is set for
22
August 8, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. Under this Court’s Pretrial Standing Order, the parties are required to
23
meet and confer by July 18, 2012, and file their pretrial materials by July 25, 2012. Accordingly,
24
the Court requests that the parties file a stipulation of dismissal as soon as possible. By 5:00 p.m.,
25
Friday, July 13, 2012, the parties shall file a status report informing the Court what steps remain to
26
complete the settlement and when the parties intend to file their stipulation of dismissal. If the
27
parties do not foresee being able to file their stipulation of dismissal by July 25, 2012, the status
28
report shall propose an amended schedule for the pretrial submissions.
1
Case No.: 10-CV-05084-LHK
ORDER RE SETTLEMENT
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Dated: July 12, 2012
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 10-CV-05084-LHK
ORDER RE SETTLEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?