Saenz et al v. Sitaanand, Inc et al

Filing 6

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why This Case Should Not Be Dismissed. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 3/1/2011 01:30 PM. Attorneys Adam Wang and Adam Pedersen shall appear and show cause why case should not be dismissed and why they should not be sanctioned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/28/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2011)

Download PDF
Saenz et al v. Sitaanand, Inc et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION HECTOR SAENZ; YEIMI MOLINA; and JOSE DELGADO, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This action was filed on November 12, 2010. The initial case management conference originally was set for January 18, 2011, but was continued by court order to March 1, 2011 because there was no indication that defendants had been served; no Joint Case Management Statement as required by Civil Local Rule 16-9; and no one had consented or declined to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. (See Docket No. 5, January 18, 2011 Order). There is still no indication that defendants have been served. Indeed, other than the court's January 18, 2011 Order, there has been virtually no activity on the docket since this lawsuit was filed. Accordingly, this court will not hold an initial case management conference on March 1, 2011. Instead, plaintiffs' counsel Adam Wang and Adam Pedersen shall appear v. SITAANAND, INC. dba KUMUD GROCERIES; RAMDHUNI CORPORATION dba KUMUD GROCERIES; DHRUVNEAL, INC. dba KUMUD GROCERIES, GUJJU ENTERPRISE, INC. dba KORIANDER RESTAURANT; KALPESH PATEL; and DOES 1-10, Defendants. / No. C10-05150 HRL ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED *E-FILED 02-28-2011* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 before this court on March 1, 2011, 1:30 p.m. and show cause why this case should not be dismissed and why they should not be sanctioned for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 28, 2011 HOWARD R. LLOYD 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5:10-cv-05150-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: Adam Wang adamqwang@gmail.com, alpedersen@gmail.com, rosilenda@gmail.com Adam Lee Pedersen alpedersen@gmail.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?