Balasquez et al v. City of Morgan Hill et al

Filing 21

ORDER Further Continuing Briefing Schedule and Hearing re 20 . Case Management Statement due by 5/26/2011. Case Management Conference set for 6/2/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Motion Hearing set for 6/2/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Lucy H. Koh. Signed by Judge Koh on 3/21/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2011)

Download PDF
Balasquez et al v. City of Morgan Hill et al Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 10-CV-05206-LHK ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MARIA JESUS BALASQUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MORGAN HILL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 10-CV-05206-LHK ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE On March 17, 2011, the Court granted the parties' request to continue the hearing date for Defendant's motion to dismiss to May 5, 2011, and continued the briefing schedule by one week. The parties have now filed a stipulation requesting that the briefing schedule be further continued. In light of this request and the Court's schedule, the Court will further continue both the briefing schedule and motion hearing, as follows: (1) Plaintiff's opposition brief is due no later than April 21, 2011; (2) Defendant's reply brief is due no later than April 28, 2011; (3) The Court will hold a hearing, if necessary, on June 2, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. If the motion can be resolved without oral argument, the Court will notify the parties and vacate the hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 21, 2011 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?