Scott-Codiga v. County of Monterey et al

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to Amended Complaint re 23 . Signed by Judge Koh on 5/20/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

CHARLES A. BONNER, ESQ.  SB# 85413 
A. CABRAL BONNER, ESQ. SB# 247528 
LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES A. BONNER 
475 GATE FIVE RD, SUITE 212 
SAUSALITO, CA 94965 
TEL: (415) 331‐3070 
FAX: (415) 331‐2738 
[e-mail] 
[e-mail] 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

) Case No.: 5:10­cv­05450­LHK 
GEORGINE SCOTT‐CODIGA, 
)   
)  STIPULATION OF SERVICE AND 

Plaintiff, 
)  STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING 
)  TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO 

vs. 
)  PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT 
) 
COUNTY OF MONTEREY, MONTEREY 
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF MIKE  ) 
) 
KANALAKIS, JERRY TEETER, VICTOR LURZ,  ) 
COMMANDER MIKE RICHARDS; SGT JOE  ) 
MOSES; and GILBERT AGUILAR and Does 1  ) 
) 
through 50, inclusive, 
) 
) 

Defendants 

The parties through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate and agree to 

an order on the following issues: 
1. Defendants, COUNTY OF MONTEREY, MONTEREY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, 
SHERIFF MIKE KANALAKIS, JERRY TEETER, and VICTOR LURZ were timely 

25
26

served with Plaintiff’s initial complaint.  Following service, Plaintiff filed a 

27

supplemental claim alleging new causes of action based on conduct which 

28

took place following the filing of the initial complaint.  Parties met and 

Stipulation and Order Regarding Service and Enlarging Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint - 1

1

conferred and decided it would be most efficient for Defendants to respond 

2

to Plaintiff’s to‐be‐filed amended complaint rather than the filed and served 

3

initial complaint.  Therefore parties agreed and hereby stipulate that 

4

Defendants do not have to respond to Plaintiff’s initial complaint, filed on 

5
6
7

December 1, 2010. 
2. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on May 6, 2011.  Plaintiff served 

8

Defendants, COUNTY OF MONTEREY, MONTEREY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, 

9

SHERIFF MIKE KANALAKIS, JERRY TEETER, VICTOR LURZ, COMMANDER 

10

MIKE RICHARDS; SGT JOE MOSES; and GILBERT AGUILAR, and each of them, 
11
12

with the amended complaint via email to Defendants’ counsel.  Parties 

13

hereby agree and stipulate that Plaintiff’s email service is sufficient service 

14

for all Defendants and all Defendants are deemed to have been served with 

15

the amended complaint as of May 17, 2011, the day counsel for the 

16
17

Defendants acknowledge receipt of the amended complaint. 

18

3. Parties hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants, COUNTY OF MONTEREY, 

19

MONTEREY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF MIKE KANALAKIS, JERRY 

20

TEETER, VICTOR LURZ, COMMANDER MIKE RICHARDS; SGT JOE MOSES; and 

21
22

GILBERT AGUILAR have until June 17, 2011 to file and serve a response to 

23

the amended complaint filed by Plaintiff GEORGINE SCOTT‐CODIGA.  Good

24

cause exists for this enlargement of time (30 additional days) given the time and

25

effort that will be necessary to prepare an appropriate responsive pleading. The

26

amended complaint involves varied claims by plaintiff, comprises 24 pages, and sets
27
28

Stipulation and Order Regarding Service and Enlarging Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint - 2

forth 10 causes of action in 86 paragraphs. The causes of action include the

1
2

following: 

3

1. RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF TITLE VII and FEHA;

4

2. RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. § 1983;

5

3. DISPARATE TREATMENT, TITLE VII AND FEHA,
6

4. FAILURE TO PREVENT DISCRIMINATION

7
8

5. INVASION OF PRIVACY

9

6. RETALIATION LABOR CODE 1102.5

10

7. VIOLATION OF LABOR CODE 1101 &1102

11

8. INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS;
12

9. VIOLATION of 42 U.S.C. § 1985

13

10. VIOLATION of 42 U.S.C. § 1986

14
15

IT IS SO STIPULATED

16

Dated:  May 19, 2011 

LAW OFFICES OF BONNER & BONNER 

/s/ A. CABRAL BONNER 
A. Cabral Bonner 
Attorney for Plaintiff 

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated:  May 19, 2011 

COUNTY COUNSEL FOR  
COUNTY OF MONTEREY  

/s/ WILLIAM K. RENTZ   

WILLIAM K. RENTZ 
Sr. Deputy County Counsel 

// 
// 

Stipulation and Order Regarding Service and Enlarging Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint - 3

1

ORDER

2

IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendants do not have to respond to Plaintiff’s initial complaint filed on
3

December 1, 2010. All Defendants, COUNTY OF MONTEREY, MONTEREY SHERIFF’S 
4
5

DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF MIKE KANALAKIS, JERRY TEETER, VICTOR LURZ, COMMANDER 

6

MIKE RICHARDS; SGT JOE MOSES; and GILBERT AGUILAR are deemed served with 

7

Plaintiff’s amended complaint.  Defendants may have to and including June 17, 2011 by which to file

8

and serve a response to Plaintiff’s amended complaint.
9
10

May 20, 2011

11
12

Dated: _______

___________________________________
HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Court Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Stipulation and Order Regarding Service and Enlarging Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint - 4