Scott-Codiga v. County of Monterey et al

Filing 59

ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference. Further Case Management Conference set for 12/21/2011 02:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 12/5/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2011)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 GEORGINE SCOTT-CODIGA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) COUNTY OF MONTEREY; MONTEREY ) SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF MIKE ) KANALAKIS; JERRY TEETER; VICTOR ) LURZ; COMMANDER MIKE RICHARDS; ) SGT JOE MOSES; and GILBERT AGUILAR ) and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive; ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 10-CV-05450-LHK ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 13 On November 21, 2011, the parties informed the Court that the case had reached a 14 settlement agreement, contingent on approval from the County of Monterey Board of Supervisors. 15 ECF No. 55. A Case Management Conference is currently scheduled for December 7, 2011. On 16 December 2, 2011, pursuant to the Court’s Order, the parties filed a joint status report informing 17 the Court that the County of Monterey Board of Supervisors had approved the settlement, but that 18 Plaintiff needed more time to dismiss/withdraw her EEOC complaint, and Defendants needed more 19 time to issue a settlement check and handle payroll issues. ECF No. 58. 20 In light of this, the Court will continue the Case Management Conference to December 21, 21 2011, at 2:00 p.m. By December 14, 2011, Plaintiff shall dismiss/withdraw her EEOC complaint, 22 and Defendants shall issue payment; otherwise, on December 14, 2011, the parties shall set a date 23 by which they will file a stipulation of dismissal. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: December 5, 2011 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 27 28 1 Case No.: 10-CV-05450-LHK ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?