DSM Dyneema v. BAE Systems Tensylon H.P. Material, Inc.

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT re 23 Stipulation filed by DSM Dyneema. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/5/2011. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 19 MOTION to Dismiss. Motion Hearing set for 8/19/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila.(ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2011)

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

FO

avila

A

H

ER

a rd J . D

LI

RT

dw
J u d ge E

R NIA

DERED
SO OR
IT IS
DIFIED
AS MO

NO

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Karin Kramer (Bar No. 87346)
[e-mail]
2
David Bilsker (Bar No. 152383)
[e-mail]
3
Arthur M. Roberts (Bar No. 275272)
[e-mail]
4
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
5 San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
6

S

Filed04/19/11 Page1 of 2

UNIT
ED

Case5:10-cv-05466-EJD Document23

N

7 Attorneys for DSM Dyneema

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11
12

DSM DYNEEMA,
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant,

13
14

Case No. CV 10-5466 EJD
RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

v.

15 BAE SYSTEMS TENSYLON H.P.
MATERIAL, INC.,
16
Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff.
17
18
19
20

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, DSM Dyneema and BAE Systems Tensylon H.P. Material,

21 Inc. submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order seeking a continuance of the hearing date and
22 briefing schedule for BAE’s pending motion to dismiss.
23

Whereas, the hearing on BAE’s motion to dismiss is now set for May 26, 2011 at 1:30

24 p.m.;
25

Whereas, the parties are engaged in productive settlement discussions and believe

26 continuing the hearing date would avoid further litigation expenses and use of judicial resources;
27
28
Case No. CV 10-5466 RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case5:10-cv-05466-EJD Document23

1

Filed04/19/11 Page2 of 2

Therefore, it is hereby stipulated and agreed that the hearing date for BAE’s motion to

August 2011 at 9:00 P.M.
2 dismiss now scheduled for May 26, 2011 will be continued to June 9,19, 2011 at1:30 a.m. The

3 deadlines for the opposition and reply briefs are adjusted accordingly.
4 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5
6 Dated: April 19, 2011
7

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

8
By /s/ Karin Kramer1
Karin Kramer
Attorneys for DSM Dyneema

9
10
11
12 Dated: April 19, 2011

PERKINS COIE LLP

13
14

By /s/ Christopher Kao
Christopher Kao
Attorneys for BAE Systems Tensylon H.P.
Material, Inc.

15
16
17
18

19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.AS MODIFIED.
20
May 5
21 Dated: ___________________, 2011
22
23

The Hon. Edward J. Davila
Richard Seeborg
United States District Court Judge

24
25
26
27
28

1

In compliance with General Order 45(X)(B), I attest that I received concurrence to file this
document from each signatory hereto.

Case No. CV 10-5466 RS
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE