DSM Dyneema v. BAE Systems Tensylon H.P. Material, Inc.
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT re 23 Stipulation filed by DSM Dyneema. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/5/2011. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 19 MOTION to Dismiss. Motion Hearing set for 8/19/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila.(ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2011)
a rd J . D
J u d ge E
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Karin Kramer (Bar No. 87346)
David Bilsker (Bar No. 152383)
Arthur M. Roberts (Bar No. 275272)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
5 San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Filed04/19/11 Page1 of 2
7 Attorneys for DSM Dyneema
D IS T IC T O
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Case No. CV 10-5466 EJD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
15 BAE SYSTEMS TENSYLON H.P.
Defendant and Counterclaim
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, DSM Dyneema and BAE Systems Tensylon H.P. Material,
21 Inc. submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order seeking a continuance of the hearing date and
22 briefing schedule for BAE’s pending motion to dismiss.
Whereas, the hearing on BAE’s motion to dismiss is now set for May 26, 2011 at 1:30
Whereas, the parties are engaged in productive settlement discussions and believe
26 continuing the hearing date would avoid further litigation expenses and use of judicial resources;
Case No. CV 10-5466 RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Filed04/19/11 Page2 of 2
Therefore, it is hereby stipulated and agreed that the hearing date for BAE’s motion to
August 2011 at 9:00 P.M.
2 dismiss now scheduled for May 26, 2011 will be continued to June 9,19, 2011 at1:30 a.m. The
3 deadlines for the opposition and reply briefs are adjusted accordingly.
4 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
6 Dated: April 19, 2011
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
By /s/ Karin Kramer1
Attorneys for DSM Dyneema
12 Dated: April 19, 2011
PERKINS COIE LLP
By /s/ Christopher Kao
Attorneys for BAE Systems Tensylon H.P.
19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.AS MODIFIED.
21 Dated: ___________________, 2011
The Hon. Edward J. Davila
United States District Court Judge
In compliance with General Order 45(X)(B), I attest that I received concurrence to file this
document from each signatory hereto.
Case No. CV 10-5466 RS
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?