DSM Dyneema v. BAE Systems Tensylon H.P. Material, Inc.

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT re 23 Stipulation filed by DSM Dyneema. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/5/2011. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 19 MOTION to Dismiss. Motion Hearing set for 8/19/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila.(ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2011)

Download PDF
RT U O S DISTRICT TE C TA FO avila A H ER a rd J . D LI RT dw J u d ge E R NIA DERED SO OR IT IS DIFIED AS MO NO 1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Karin Kramer (Bar No. 87346) karinkramer@quinnemanuel.com 2 David Bilsker (Bar No. 152383) davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com 3 Arthur M. Roberts (Bar No. 275272) arthurroberts@quinnemanuel.com 4 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 5 San Francisco, California 94111-4788 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 6 S Filed04/19/11 Page1 of 2 UNIT ED Case5:10-cv-05466-EJD Document23 N 7 Attorneys for DSM Dyneema F D IS T IC T O R C 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 12 DSM DYNEEMA, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, 13 14 Case No. CV 10-5466 EJD RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE v. 15 BAE SYSTEMS TENSYLON H.P. MATERIAL, INC., 16 Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. 17 18 19 20 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, DSM Dyneema and BAE Systems Tensylon H.P. Material, 21 Inc. submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order seeking a continuance of the hearing date and 22 briefing schedule for BAE’s pending motion to dismiss. 23 Whereas, the hearing on BAE’s motion to dismiss is now set for May 26, 2011 at 1:30 24 p.m.; 25 Whereas, the parties are engaged in productive settlement discussions and believe 26 continuing the hearing date would avoid further litigation expenses and use of judicial resources; 27 28 Case No. CV 10-5466 RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case5:10-cv-05466-EJD Document23 1 Filed04/19/11 Page2 of 2 Therefore, it is hereby stipulated and agreed that the hearing date for BAE’s motion to August 2011 at 9:00 P.M. 2 dismiss now scheduled for May 26, 2011 will be continued to June 9,19, 2011 at1:30 a.m. The 3 deadlines for the opposition and reply briefs are adjusted accordingly. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 5 6 Dated: April 19, 2011 7 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 8 By /s/ Karin Kramer1 Karin Kramer Attorneys for DSM Dyneema 9 10 11 12 Dated: April 19, 2011 PERKINS COIE LLP 13 14 By /s/ Christopher Kao Christopher Kao Attorneys for BAE Systems Tensylon H.P. Material, Inc. 15 16 17 18 19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.AS MODIFIED. 20 May 5 21 Dated: ___________________, 2011 22 23 The Hon. Edward J. Davila Richard Seeborg United States District Court Judge 24 25 26 27 28 1 In compliance with General Order 45(X)(B), I attest that I received concurrence to file this document from each signatory hereto. Case No. CV 10-5466 RS -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?