Georgia C. Brown-Kyes v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc et al

Filing 17

ORDER GRANTING 16 Defendant's Motion to Appear by Telephone. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/25/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2011)

Download PDF
Georgia C. Brown-Kyes v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ** E-filed February 25, 2011 ** NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION GEORGIA C. BROWN-KYES, Plaintiff, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ Having considered defendant Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.'s counsel's request to appear by telephone at the motion hearing set for March 1, 2011 at 10:00 a.m., and good cause appearing, the Court grants the request. Counsel shall initiate the call to the court via CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 just prior to the time appointed for the conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 25, 2011 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. C10-05535 HRL ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT MERS'S REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE [Re: Docket No. 16] For the Northern District of California Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C10-05535 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: Stephanie Ann Chambers sac@severson.com, lwd@severson.come Notice will be provided by other means to: Georgia C. Brown-Kyes 2144 Vizcaya Circle Campbell, CA 95124 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?