Murillo v. Aurora Loan Services et al

Filing 15

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. As of this date, Plaintiff has not complied with the show cause order as directed and did not appear at the hearing on September 9, 2011. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecuti on pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/9/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/9/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION
NO. 5:10-cv-05684 EJD

YOLANDA M. MURILLO,

11

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE

Plaintiff(s),
v.

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
AURORA LOAN SERVICES, et. al.,
13
Defendant(s).
14

/

15

On August 17, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiff Yolanda M. Murillo to show cause why this

16

case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution after Plaintiff failed to amend her complaint as

17

previously ordered. See Docket Item No. 13. The Court admonished Plaintiff that the Court would

18

dismiss this action with prejudice should he fail to respond or otherwise fail to show good cause.

19

As of this date, Plaintiff has not complied with the show cause order as directed and did not

20

appear at the hearing on September 9, 2011. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH

21

PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk

22

shall close this file.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated: September 9, 2011
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

26
27
28
1
Case No. 5:10-cv-05684 EJD
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE (EJDLC1)