Guillen v. Bank of America Corporation et al
Filing
78
ORDER re 76 Ex Parte Application for Administrative Relief for Order to Allow Deposition by Telephone/Video Conference filed by Narcizo Zavala Guillen. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on August 31, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)
1
2
3
4
Ronald Wilcox, Esq., State Bar No. 176601
1900 The Alameda, Suite 530
San Jose, CA 95126
Tel: (408) 296-0400
Fax: (408) 296-0486
Email: ronaldwilcox@post.harvard.edu
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Narcizo Guillen
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
NARCIZO ZAVALA GUILLEN,
Plaintiff,
CIV. NO. 10-05825 EJD PSG
vs.
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC, TRANSUNION LLC, CORELOGIC
CREDCO, LLC., f/k/a First American
Credco, a division of First American Real
Estate Solutions, LLC,, SRA ASSOCIATES,
INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SERVICES,LLC., and DOES 1-10,
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
RELIEF FOR ORDER TO ALLOW
DEPOSITION BY TELEPHONE/VIDEO
CONFERENCE
HON. PAUL GREWAL
Defendants.
16
17
I. INTRODUCTION
18
Plaintiff has noticed the deposition of Defendant Bank of America’s’ employee, Rhonda
19
Weston, for Tuesday, September 20, 2011, in Buffalo, NY. The deposition notice and subpoena
20
is attached as Exhibit 1. Plaintiff seeks an order allowing the deposition be conducted and
21
22
23
recorded via remote means (via telephone and/or Skype telephone and video), as noticed.
Plaintiff’s counsel has conducted five (5) Skype video depositions this year, including
two recently, ordered by the Hon. Paul Grewal; the method is effective and efficient.
24
25
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FOR ORDER TO ALLOW DEPOSITION BY
TELEPHONE/VIDEOCONFERENCE, DECLARATION, and [Proposed] ORDER - 1
However, on July 28, 2011 Bank of America insisted that if Plaintiff wanted to take the
1
2
3
deposition by remote means he would need to obtain a Court order.1 Further meet and confer
efforts have been unsuccessful.
With the date of the depositions fast approaching, and the necessary arrangements
4
5
needing to be made, Plaintiff was forced to file this Motion for Administrative Relief.
6
II. LEGAL DISCUSSION
7
8
9
10
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(4) the parties may stipulate- or the court may on motion
order- that a deposition be taken by telephone or other remote means. Plaintiff would like to
minimize costs. A videoconference deposition is cost-effective since it avoids or minimizes
expensive travel time and costs. Federal Civil Procedure Before Trial (2007), The Rutter
11
Group, 11:1470, 11-170. Leave to take depositions by telephone is granted liberally. Brown v.
12
13
14
15
16
Carr, 253 F.R.D. 410, 412 (S.D. TX 2008). A desire to save money constitutes good cause to
depose out-of-state witnesses telephone or remote means. The burden is on the opposing party to
show how they would be prejudiced. Id. at 11:472, citing Cressler v. Neuenschwander, 170
F.R.D. 20, 21 (D. KS 1996).
17
Furthermore, Courts have stated that experimentation in new methods of recording
18
depositions should be encouraged. Rice's Toyota World, Inc. v Southeast Toyota Distributors,
19
Inc., 114 FRD 647 (MD NC 1987)(the court also refused to limit video depositions to important
20
witnesses who might be unavailable for trial since plaintiff was not requesting that regular
21
22
23
stenographer be dispensed with, thus sharply reducing risks of video deposition). Also see, Riley
v. Murdock, 156 FRD 130 (ED NC 1994)(allowing videotaped deposition), and Fanelli v.
Centenary College, 211 F.R.D. 268 (D. NJ 2002)(anxiety over videotaping not god cause
24
25
1
Citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(4).
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FOR ORDER TO ALLOW DEPOSITION BY
TELEPHONE/VIDEOCONFERENCE, DECLARATION, and [Proposed] ORDER - 2
1
2
3
sufficient to warrant a protective order).
III. EFFORTS TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER
On July 28, 2011, the parties discussed the deposition, and Plaintiff indicated he would
4
conduct it via remote means (via telephone and/or Skype telephone/videoconference which also
5
allows a recording), with the court reporter being in the presence of the witness in Buffalo, NY.
6
Bank of America insisted Plaintiff needed to obtain a Court order.
7
8
9
10
On the mornings of August 29 and 30, 2011, Plaintiff attempted to meet and confer
further by telephone and email. Despite being informed Bank of America’s counsel would be in
the office on August 29, 2011, Plaintiff has yet to hear back from the bank.
IV. RELIEF REQUESTED
11
With the deposition date of September 20, 2011, fast approaching Plaintiff respectfully
12
13
14
15
16
seeks an order from the court permitting the depositions be conducted and recorded via remote
means (via telephone and/or Skype telephone and video).
/s/Ronald Wilcox
Ronald Wilcox
Attorney for Plaintiff
8/31/11
Date
17
DECLARATION
18
19
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that each of
20
the above facts, and references to Exhibits are true and correct.
21
/s/Ronald Wilcox
Ronald Wilcox
Attorney for Plaintiff
22
8/31/11
Date
23
24
25
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FOR ORDER TO ALLOW DEPOSITION BY
TELEPHONE/VIDEOCONFERENCE, DECLARATION, and [Proposed] ORDER - 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
Plaintiff’s Motion to conduct the deposition of Rhonda Weston via telephone and/or
Skype video conference (and simultaneously record such) is hereby GRANTED. The
suggestion that a court order was required here is plainly flase. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(4).
The parties are encouraged to stipulate to such matters in the future to avoid unnecessarily
burdening the court.
Date: 8/31/2011
6
7
8
_______________________________
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
HON. PAUL GREWAL
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FOR ORDER TO ALLOW DEPOSITION BY
TELEPHONE/VIDEOCONFERENCE, DECLARATION, and [Proposed] ORDER - 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?