Lansmont Corporation v. SPX Corporation et al
Filing
58
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending the Deadline to Complete Early Neutral Evaluation Program re 57 Stipulation. Deadline for ENE due 10/17/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/19/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2011)
1 [COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGES]
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
(SAN JOSE DIVISION)
10
11
12
LANSMONT CORPORATION,
Civil Action No. 5:10-cv-05860-EJD
Plaintiff,
13
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING:
v.
14
SPX CORPORATION, a Delaware
15 corporation; SPECTRIS, PLC, a private
limited company; BRÜEL & KJAER, a
16 corporation; and HBM, INC., a corporation,
Defendants.
17
1. DEADLINE TO COMPLETE EARLY
NEUTRAL EVALUATION PROGRAM
SESSION
[ADR Local Rule 5-5 and Civil Local Rule
7-12]
The Honorable Edward J. Davila
United States District Judge
Courtroom 1, 5th Floor
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
831014.1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING DATES AND DEADLINES
Civil Action No. 5:10-cv-05860-EJD
1
The following stipulation requests that the deadline for the parties to complete an
2 Early Neutral Evaluation ("ENE") Program session, currently set for September 28, 2011, be
3 continued to October 17, 2011 and that all related deadlines be continued accordingly.
4
STIPULATION
Pursuant to ADR Local Rule 5-5 and Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Lansmont
5
6 Corporation (“Lansmont”) and Defendant SPX Corporation (“SPX”), the only parties remaining in
7 this action, stipulate and request as follows:
1.
8
WHEREAS, on June 30, 2011, the Court issued an Order Referring Case to
9 Early Neutral Evaluation, (Docket No. 52) ordering that the parties attend an ENE session within
10 90 days of the Order, which deadline would expire on September 28, 2011;
2.
11
WHEREAS, on July 26, 2011, the Clerk of Court issued a Notice of
12 Appointment of Evaluator, appointing John L. Cooper as the Evaluator for this case (Docket No.
13 56);
3.
14
WHEREAS, on September 8, 2011, the parties and the Evaluator agreed
15 upon a date of October 17, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. for the ENE session, which agreement followed after
16 their August 30, 2011 ADR Local Rule 5-7 scheduling conference;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED that the
17
18 Court continue the current September 28, 2011 deadline to hold an Early Neutral Evaluation
19 session to October 17, 2011, and continue all related deadlines accordingly.
20
//
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
831014.1
Civil Action No. 5:10-cv-05860-EJD
-1-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING DATES AND DEADLINES
1
E-FILING ATTESTATION
2
By his signature below, and pursuant to General Order 45, counsel for SPX attests
3 that counsel for all parties whose electronic signatures appear below have concurred in the filing
4 of this Stipulation.
5
6 Dated: September 12, 2011
PEARSON SIMON WARSHAW & PENNY LLP
7
By: /s/ William J. Newsom________________
Bruce L. Simon
William J. Newsom
Catherine M. Lee
44 Montgomery Street , Suite 2450
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-433-9000
Facsimile: 415-433-9008
bsimon@pswplaw.com
wnewsom@pswplaw.com
8
9
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LANSMONT CORPORATION
14
15
16 Dated: September 12, 2011
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON
LLP
17
By: /s/ Nathaniel Bruno____________________
Philip F. Atkins-Pattenson
Nathaniel Bruno
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4106
Telephone: 415-434-9100
Facsimile: 415-434-3947
patkinspattenson@sheppardmullin.com
nbruno@sheppardmullin.com
18
19
20
21
22
23
Attorneys for Defendant
SPX CORPORATION
24
25
26
27
28
831014.1
Civil Action No. 5:10-cv-05860-EJD
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING DATES AND DEADLINES
1
ORDER
2
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
7 Dated:
September 19, 2011
The Honorable Edward J. Davila
United States District Court Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
831014.1
Civil Action No. 5:10-cv-05860-EJD
-3-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING DATES AND DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?