Lalo v. Apple, Inc et al
Filing
103
Proposed Order APPROVING STIPULATED AGREEMENT TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS FLURRY, INC. AND PINCH MEDIA, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT by Flurry, Inc.. (Lees, Gail) (Filed on 5/18/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
GAIL E. LEES, SBN 90363
GLees@gibsondunn.com
S. ASHLIE BERINGER, SBN 263977
ABeringer@gibsondunn.com
JOSHUA A. JESSEN, SBN 222831
JJessen@gibsondunn.com
1881 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: 650.849.5300
Facsimile: 650.849.5333
Attorneys for Defendants
FLURRY, INC.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
In re iPhone Application Litigation
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878 LHK (PSG)
13
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING
STIPULATED AGREEMENT TO
EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS
FLURRY, INC. AND PINCH MEDIA, INC.
TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND TO FIRST CONSOLIDATED
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
14
15
16
17
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
1
Order Approving Stipulation to Extend Time – Case No. 5:10-CV-05878 LHK (PSG)
1
Having considered the Stipulated Agreement for an Order to Extend Time for Defendants
2
Flurry, Inc. (“Flurry”) and Pinch Media, Inc. (“Pinch Media”) to Answer or Otherwise Respond to
3
First Consolidated Class Action Complaint, and good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY
4
ORDERED that the stipulation is APPROVED. Flurry and Pinch Media shall have up to and
5
including June 13, 2011 to answer or otherwise respond to the First Consolidated Class Action
6
Complaint.
7
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
DATED: ______________________
THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
2
Order Approving Stipulation to Extend Time – Case No. 5:10-CV-05878 LHK (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?