Lalo v. Apple, Inc et al

Filing 103

Proposed Order APPROVING STIPULATED AGREEMENT TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS FLURRY, INC. AND PINCH MEDIA, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT by Flurry, Inc.. (Lees, Gail) (Filed on 5/18/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP GAIL E. LEES, SBN 90363 GLees@gibsondunn.com S. ASHLIE BERINGER, SBN 263977 ABeringer@gibsondunn.com JOSHUA A. JESSEN, SBN 222831 JJessen@gibsondunn.com 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: 650.849.5300 Facsimile: 650.849.5333 Attorneys for Defendants FLURRY, INC. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 In re iPhone Application Litigation CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878 LHK (PSG) 13 [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED AGREEMENT TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS FLURRY, INC. AND PINCH MEDIA, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 14 15 16 17 The Honorable Lucy H. Koh 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1 Order Approving Stipulation to Extend Time – Case No. 5:10-CV-05878 LHK (PSG) 1 Having considered the Stipulated Agreement for an Order to Extend Time for Defendants 2 Flurry, Inc. (“Flurry”) and Pinch Media, Inc. (“Pinch Media”) to Answer or Otherwise Respond to 3 First Consolidated Class Action Complaint, and good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY 4 ORDERED that the stipulation is APPROVED. Flurry and Pinch Media shall have up to and 5 including June 13, 2011 to answer or otherwise respond to the First Consolidated Class Action 6 Complaint. 7 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 DATED: ______________________ THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2 Order Approving Stipulation to Extend Time – Case No. 5:10-CV-05878 LHK (PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?