Lalo v. Apple, Inc et al

Filing 120

Certificate of Interested Entities by Pinch Media, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Flurry, Inc. for Pinch Media, Inc.. DEFENDANT PINCH MEDIA, INC.S CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS (Lees, Gail) (Filed on 5/20/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP GAIL E. LEES, SBN 90363 GLees@gibsondunn.com S. ASHLIE BERINGER, SBN 263977 ABeringer@gibsondunn.com JOSHUA A. JESSEN, SBN 222831 JJessen@gibsondunn.com 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: 650.849.5300 Facsimile: 650.849.5333 Attorneys for Defendant PINCH MEDIA, INC. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 In re iPhone Application Litigation CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878 LHK (PSG) 14 DEFENDANT PINCH MEDIA, INC.’S CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS 15 16 The Honorable Lucy H. Koh 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1 CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES – CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878 LHK (PSG) 1 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Defendant Pinch Media, Inc. (“Pinch Media”) states that it is a 2 nongovernmental corporate party in the above-captioned action. Pinch Media is a wholly-owned 3 subsidiary of Defendant Flurry, Inc. (“Flurry”). Additionally, pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-16, the 4 undersigned certifies that as of this date, Pinch Media is unaware of any other persons, associations 5 of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, or other entities – other than the named parties – that 6 have a financial or other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of this 7 proceeding. 8 DATED: May 20, 2011 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 9 By: 10 11 /s/ Gail E. Lees Gail E. Lees Attorneys for Defendant PINCH MEDIA, INC. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2 CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES – CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878 LHK (PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?