Lalo v. Apple, Inc et al
Filing
120
Certificate of Interested Entities by Pinch Media, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Flurry, Inc. for Pinch Media, Inc.. DEFENDANT PINCH MEDIA, INC.S CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS (Lees, Gail) (Filed on 5/20/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
GAIL E. LEES, SBN 90363
GLees@gibsondunn.com
S. ASHLIE BERINGER, SBN 263977
ABeringer@gibsondunn.com
JOSHUA A. JESSEN, SBN 222831
JJessen@gibsondunn.com
1881 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: 650.849.5300
Facsimile: 650.849.5333
Attorneys for Defendant
PINCH MEDIA, INC.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13
In re iPhone Application Litigation
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878 LHK (PSG)
14
DEFENDANT PINCH MEDIA, INC.’S
CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED
ENTITIES OR PERSONS
15
16
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
1
CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES – CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878 LHK (PSG)
1
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Defendant Pinch Media, Inc. (“Pinch Media”) states that it is a
2
nongovernmental corporate party in the above-captioned action. Pinch Media is a wholly-owned
3
subsidiary of Defendant Flurry, Inc. (“Flurry”). Additionally, pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-16, the
4
undersigned certifies that as of this date, Pinch Media is unaware of any other persons, associations
5
of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, or other entities – other than the named parties – that
6
have a financial or other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of this
7
proceeding.
8
DATED: May 20, 2011
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
9
By:
10
11
/s/ Gail E. Lees
Gail E. Lees
Attorneys for Defendant
PINCH MEDIA, INC.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES – CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878 LHK (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?