Lalo v. Apple, Inc et al

Filing 134

ORDER Granting in part 133 Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule. Signed by Judge Koh on 6/3/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16

IN RE IPHONE APPLICATION LITIG.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 10-CV-05878-LHK
ORDER GRANTING IN PART JOINT
STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
(re: dkt. #133)

On June 3, 2011, the parties filed a joint stipulation to extend the briefing schedule on

17

Defendants’ anticipated motion to dismiss. See Dkt. #133. Under the current schedule, the

18

anticipated motions to dismiss are due by June 13, 2011, with Plaintiffs’ oppositions due by July

19

11, 2011, and Defendants’ replies due by July 25, 2011. A hearing on the motions will be set for

20

September 1, 2011. Defendants represent that, in an effort to coordinate consolidated motions to

21

dismiss rather than file separate motions, an extension of one week is warranted. Plaintiffs agree to

22

a short extension of the briefing schedule. The parties do not seek an extension of the hearing date,

23

but instead request the following briefing schedule: motions to dismiss due by June 20, 2011;

24

oppositions due by July 25, 2011; and replies due by August 8, 2011.

25

The Court appreciates, and supports, the parties’ efforts at consolidating their briefing and

26

avoiding repetitive arguments. The parties’ request for an extension is granted as follows: the

27

anticipated motions to dismiss are now due by June 20, 2011; oppositions are now due by July 18,

28

2011; and replies are now due by August 1, 2011. If feasible, the Court’s preference would be for
1
Case No.: 10-CV-05878-LHK
ORDER GRANTING IN PART STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES

1

a single motion to dismiss, to which the Court would be amenable to a reasonable request for an

2

extension of otherwise applicable page limitations.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: June 3, 2011

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 10-CV-05878-LHK
ORDER GRANTING IN PART STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES