Lalo v. Apple, Inc et al

Filing 201

MOTION to Appear by Telephone (Request of Peter E. Seidman to Appear by Telephone) filed by Anthony Chiu. (Seidman, Peter) (Filed on 8/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 7 PETER E. SEIDMAN (pro hac vice) ANDREI V. RADO MELISSA RYAN CLARK (pro hac vice) pseidman@milberg.com arado@milberg.com mclark@milberg.com MILBERG LLP One Pennsylvania Plaza, 49th Floor New York, New York 10119 Telephone: (212) 594-5300 Facsimile: (212) 868-1229 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION In re iPhone Application Litigation Case No. 10-cv-5878 LHK (PSG) (Lead) 12 REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE 13 CMC Date: August 8, 2012 Time: 2:00 p.m. Hon. Lucy H. Koh 14 15 16 17 18 TO ALL PARTIES HEREIN AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Peter E. Seidman requests permission by the Court to appear telephonically at the abovereferenced matter on August 8, 2011, for the Case Management Conference. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Request to Appear by Telephone Case No. 5:10-cv-5878-LHK 1 DATED: August 3, 2012 /s/ Peter E. Seidman 2 Peter E. Seidman 3 7 PETER E. SEIDMAN (pro hac vice) ANDREI V. RADO MELISSA RYAN CLARK (pro hac vice) MILBERG LLP One Pennsylvania Plaza, 49th Floor New York, New York 10119 Telephone: (212) 594-5300 Facsimile: (212) 868-1229 8 Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Request to Appear by Telephone -2- Case No. 5:10-cv-5878-LHK 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing was filed this 3rd day of August 2012 through the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system, which automatically serves it to all counsel of record in this action. 5 6 /s/ Peter E. Seidman Peter E. Seidman 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Request to Appear by Telephone -3- Case No. 5:10-cv-5878-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?