Lalo v. Apple, Inc et al
Filing
81
Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Consolidating Case by Apple, Inc. (Charlson, Michael) (Filed on 5/12/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Michael L. Charlson (Bar No. 122125)
Maren J. Clouse (Bar No. 228726)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
525 University Avenue, 4th Floor
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone:
(650) 463-4000
Facsimile:
(650) 463-4199
michael.charlson@hoganlovells.com
maren.clouse@hoganlovells.com
Christopher Wolf (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Columbia Square
555 Thirteenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone:
(202) 637-5600
Facsimile:
(202) 637-5910
christopher.wolf@hoganlovells.com
Clayton C. James (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
One Tabor Center, Suite 1500
1200 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone:
(303) 899-7300
Facsimile:
(303) 899-7333
clay.james@hoganlovells.com
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC., a California corporation
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
18
19
20
In re iPhone Application Litigation
Case No. CV-10-5878 LHK (PSG)
21
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING
CASE
22
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OGAN L OVEL LS US
LLP
ATT ORNE YS AT LA W
PALO AL TO
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASE
Case No. CV 10-5878 LHK
1
These actions were consolidated pursuant to the Court’s March 15, 2011 Order (Dkt. No.
2
36) (“Order Consolidating Case”). On May 6, 2011, the Court issued a Related Case Order
3
regarding Jenkins, et al. v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 11-CV-01828 (Dkt. No. 76), in which the Court
4
found that the Jenkins action is related to these actions and ordered it reassigned to this Court.
5
The Order Consolidating Case provides that “[e]ach new case that arises out of the subject matter
6
of the Consolidated Action which is filed in this Court or transferred to this Court, shall be
7
consolidated with the Consolidated Action and this Order shall apply thereto, unless a party in
8
such newly filed or transferred action objects to consolidation … or any provision of this order,
9
within ten (10) days after the date upon which a copy of this Order is served on counsel for such
10
party ….” Counsel in the Jenkins action was served with a copy of the Order Consolidating Case
11
on April 14, 2011 (Dkt. No. 68-2). No objection to consolidation or the Order Consolidating
12
Case has been filed. Pursuant to the Order Consolidating Case, the Jenkins action is therefore
13
consolidated with these actions.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
DATED: ______________, 2011
____________________________________________
THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OGAN L OVEL LS US
LLP
ATT ORNE YS AT LA W
PALO AL TO
-1-
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASE
Case No. CV 10-5878 LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?