Lalo v. Apple, Inc et al

Filing 95

Proposed Order re 93 Granting Defendant Apple Inc.'s Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Complaint by Apple, Inc. (Charlson, Michael) (Filed on 5/16/2011) Modified on 5/20/2011 counsel failed to link entry to document #93 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Michael L. Charlson (Bar No. 122125)
Maren J. Clouse (Bar No. 228726)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
525 University Avenue, 4th Floor
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Christopher Wolf (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Columbia Square
555 Thirteenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
Clayton C. James (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
One Tabor Center, Suite 1500
1200 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC., a California corporation
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

18
19
20

In re iPhone Application Litigation

Case No. CV-10-5878 LHK (PSG)

22

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S
MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

23

The Honorable Lucy H. Koh

21

24
25
26
27
28
H OGAN L OVEL LS US
LLP
ATT ORNE YS AT LA W
PALO AL TO

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME
Case No. CV 10-5878 LHK

1

Having considered Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to

2

Complaint and the Declaration of Maren J. Clouse in support thereof, filed on May 16, 2011, and

3

good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Apple Inc.’s Motion to Enlarge Time

4

is GRANTED. Apple shall file its response to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Consolidated Complaint

5

by June 13, 2011.

6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10
11

DATED: ______________, 2011

____________________________________________
THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OGAN L OVEL LS US
LLP
ATT ORNE YS AT LA W
PALO AL TO

-1-

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME
Case No. CV 10-5878 LHK