Quiroz v. Cate et al

Filing 319

ORDER REGARDING VIDEO CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/15/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 6 7 MARK ROBERT QUIROZ, Plaintiff, 8 9 Case No. 5:11-cv-00016 LHK (NC) ORDER REGARDING VIDEO CONFERENCE v. ROBERT A. HOREL, et al., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 13 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 14 Pursuant to this Court's Notice of Settlement Conference, the settlement conference is 15 scheduled for August 27, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, 280 South First Street, 16 San Jose. 17 Plaintiff shall appear at the settlement conference via video conference. Authorities at 18 California Correctional Institution at Tehachapi are directed to contact the Court's Courtroom 19 Technology Specialist, Jackson Xu at 408.535.5384, Jackson_Xu@cand.uscourts.gov, to 20 coordinate the video conference appearance. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 15, 2015 NATHANAEL COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 6 MARK ROBERT QUIROZ, No. 5:11-cv-00016 LHK (NC) 7 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 8 v. 9 ROBERT A. HOREL, et al., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 12 13 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, 14 U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, and that on July 15, 2015 I served a true 15 and correct copy of the attached, via email to the following: 16 17 Terri Jones terri.jones@cdcr.ca.gov 18 Ada Miles ada.miles@cdcr.ca.gov 19 20 21 22 RICHARD W. WIEKING, CLERK 23 24 By:_________________________ Lili M. Harrell, Deputy Clerk 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?