Tojino v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Koh on 6/8/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
AMELIA J. TOJINO,
Plaintiff,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et
al.,
Defendant.
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 11-CV-00045-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
15
On May 18, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be
16
dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to timely serve Defendants. The Court noted that
17
Plaintiff had failed to appear at a scheduled Case Management Conference, failed to consent or
18
decline to proceed before a Magistrate Judge by the deadline set by Judge Grewal, and failed to
19
serve Defendants within the time period set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The
20
Court ordered Plaintiff to file a written response by June 2, 2011, and advised Plaintiff that failure
21
to timely respond would result in dismissal of this case without prejudice. Plaintiff has not filed a
22
response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause or taken any other action to litigate this case.
23
Accordingly, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to timely serve
24
Defendants and failure to prosecute. The Clerk shall close the file.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
Dated: June 8, 2011
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-00045-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?