Tojino v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Koh on 6/8/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

SAN JOSE DIVISION

8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

AMELIA J. TOJINO,
Plaintiff,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et
al.,
Defendant.

13
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 11-CV-00045-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT
PREJUDICE

15

On May 18, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be

16

dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to timely serve Defendants. The Court noted that

17

Plaintiff had failed to appear at a scheduled Case Management Conference, failed to consent or

18

decline to proceed before a Magistrate Judge by the deadline set by Judge Grewal, and failed to

19

serve Defendants within the time period set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The

20

Court ordered Plaintiff to file a written response by June 2, 2011, and advised Plaintiff that failure

21

to timely respond would result in dismissal of this case without prejudice. Plaintiff has not filed a

22

response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause or taken any other action to litigate this case.

23

Accordingly, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to timely serve

24

Defendants and failure to prosecute. The Clerk shall close the file.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27

Dated: June 8, 2011

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-00045-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE