Tojino v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 5

ORDER That Case Be Reassigned. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 22, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et )
)
al.,
)
)
Defendants.
___________________________________ )
AMELIA J. TOJINO,

Case No.: C 11-00045 PSG
ORDER THAT CASE BE
REASSIGNED

17
18
A case management conference was scheduled to be held on April 5, 2011. Thus, the
19
parties were required either to consent to proceed before a magistrate judge or to request
20

reassignment to a district judge by March 29, 2011. 1 None of the parties had either consented or

21
declined to proceed before a magistrate judge by that date.
22
On March 30, 2011, the court continued the case management conference and ordered the
23
parties to file either a “Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge,” or else a
24
“Declination to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment”
25
no later than April 5, 2011. To date, none of the parties has done so. Accordingly,
26
27
1

28

See 1/5/2011 ADR Scheduling Order (requiring that a case management statement be
submitted no later than March 29, 2011); Civ. L.R. 73-1(a)(1) (requiring parties to consent or request
reassignment by the deadline for filing the case management conference statement).
ORDER, page 1

1
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be reassigned to a district judge.
Dated: April 22, 2011

3
4

PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER, page 2