Lompa Farms, Inc v. Anchor Warehouse Services, LLC et al
Filing
117
ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The above-entitled matter is scheduled for a Preliminary Pretrial Conference on March 2, 2012 (see 78 ). Although the parties failed to file a Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement as requ ired, the court nonetheless finds a Preliminary Pretrial Conference premature at this time due to the pending Motion to Dismiss. Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement due by 5/1/2012. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/11/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/28/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00062 EJD
LOMPA FARMS, INC.,
11
ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
Plaintiff(s),
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
v.
ANCHOR WAREHOUSE SERVICES
LLC., et. al.,
14
15
16
Defendant(s).
/
The above-entitled matter is scheduled for a Preliminary Pretrial Conference on March 2,
17
2012. See Docket Item No. 78. Although the parties failed to file a Joint Preliminary Pretrial
18
Conference Statement as required, the court nonetheless finds a Preliminary Pretrial Conference
19
premature at this time due to the pending Motion to Dismiss. See Docket Item No. 115.
20
Accordingly, the Preliminary Pretrial Conference scheduled for March 2, 2012, is
21
CONTINUED to May 11, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. The parties shall file a Joint Preliminary Pretrial
22
Conference Statement no later than May 1, 2012.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: February 28, 2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00062 EJD
ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?