Hayes v. Hedgpeth et al

Filing 24

JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated in the order denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, judgment is entered in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/1/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 MILTON N. HAYES, 12 13 Petitioner, vs. 14 ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 No. C 11-00161 EJD (PR) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT 17 18 19 20 For the reasons stated in the order denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, judgment is entered in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. 21 22 DATED: 11/1/2012 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\HC.11\00161Hayes_judgment.wpd Judgment 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 MILTON N. HAYES, 4 Case Number: CV11-00161 EJD Petitioner, 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. 6 ANTHONY HEDGPETH, 7 Respondent. 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 11/2/2012 That on ___________________, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Milton N. Hayes G37757 Folsom State Prison P.O. Box 290066 Represa, CA 95671 11/2/2012 Dated: ___________________ Richard W. Wieking, Clerk /s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?