Abbott v. Tootell et al
Filing
164
ORDER Rescheduling Telephonic Status Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor Vadas on 5/2/14. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
EUREKA DIVISION
8
JOE ABBOTT,
No. 5:11-00183 LHK (NJV)
9
Plaintiff,
ORDER RESCHEDULING
STATUS CONFERENCE
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
DOCTOR E. TOOTELL, et al,
12
13
Defendants.
___________________________________/
14
15
The telephonic status conference previously set in this case for June 17, 2014, at 1:00 p.m., is
16
HEREBY RESCHEDULED for June 24, 2014, at 1:00 p.m. The parties shall dial 888-684-8852 and
17
enter access code 1868782. At the status conference, the parties shall report on the outcome of their
18
meeting regarding settlement. Defense counsel is asked to arrange for the telephonic appearance of
19
Plaintiff.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated: May 2, 2014
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
EUREKA DIVISION
8
9
JOE ABBOTT,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. 5:11-00183 LHK (NJV)
Plaintiff,
v.
13
DR. E. TOOTELL, et al.,
14
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Defendants.
___________________________________/
15
16
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on May 3, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the
17
attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) listed below, by
18
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Joe Abbott
F-14791
San Quentin State Prison
San Quentin, CA 94974
Litigation Coordinator
San Quentin State Prison
I Main Street
San Quentin, CA 94964
(by fax also)
26
27
____________________________________
28
Linn Van Meter
Administrative Law Clerk to
the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?