Abbott v. Tootell et al

Filing 164

ORDER Rescheduling Telephonic Status Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor Vadas on 5/2/14. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 EUREKA DIVISION 8 JOE ABBOTT, No. 5:11-00183 LHK (NJV) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER RESCHEDULING STATUS CONFERENCE v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 DOCTOR E. TOOTELL, et al, 12 13 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 14 15 The telephonic status conference previously set in this case for June 17, 2014, at 1:00 p.m., is 16 HEREBY RESCHEDULED for June 24, 2014, at 1:00 p.m. The parties shall dial 888-684-8852 and 17 enter access code 1868782. At the status conference, the parties shall report on the outcome of their 18 meeting regarding settlement. Defense counsel is asked to arrange for the telephonic appearance of 19 Plaintiff. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: May 2, 2014 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________ NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 EUREKA DIVISION 8 9 JOE ABBOTT, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. 5:11-00183 LHK (NJV) Plaintiff, v. 13 DR. E. TOOTELL, et al., 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Defendants. ___________________________________/ 15 16 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on May 3, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the 17 attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) listed below, by 18 depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Joe Abbott F-14791 San Quentin State Prison San Quentin, CA 94974 Litigation Coordinator San Quentin State Prison I Main Street San Quentin, CA 94964 (by fax also) 26 27 ____________________________________ 28 Linn Van Meter Administrative Law Clerk to the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?