Lantiq North America, Inc. et al v. Ralink Technology Corporation et al

Filing 268

Order Granting 267 Motion to Stay. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 10/10/2012.(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 6 LANTIQ DEUTSCHLAND GMBH Case No.: 5:11-CV-00234 EJD 7 XXX XXXXXXX [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING JOINT MOTION FOR FURTHER STAY OF THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING SETTLEMENT 8 Plaintiff, v. 9 RALINK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 The Joint Motion for Stay of the Proceedings Pending Settlement by Plaintiff and Counter- 14 Defendant Lantiq Deutschland GmbH, Defendants and Counter-Claimants Ralink Technology 15 Corporation (Taiwan), Ralink Technology Corporation (California) and Defendants MediaTek, 16 Inc., MediaTek USA, Inc. and MediaTek Wireless, Inc. came before the above-captioned court. 17 After reviewing and considering the papers on file relating to this Joint Motion for Stay, the 18 arguments of counsel thereon, as well as any and all other records on file in this case, the Court 19 hereby rules as follows: 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 21 1. That the Joint Motion for Stay is GRANTED. 22 2. All proceedings in this case, including all depositions, discovery requests, 23 inspections, and productions, are stayed until January 14, 2013 so that the parties can continue 24 settlement discussions, with the goal of consummating a settlement and seeking a dismissal of this 25 case; 26 3. The prior October 30, 2012 deadline set forth in the Court’s August 20, 2012 Order 27 (D.I. 264) for completing all noticed depositions is extended to February 4, 2013; 28 02425.51966/4999945.1 Case No. 5:11-CV-00234 EJD -1[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING JOINT MOTION FOR FURTHER STAY OF THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING SETTLEMENT 1 4. The deadline for Ralink to file its Opposition to Lantiq’s Motion for 2 Reconsideration of the Court’s July 17 Order (D.I. 250), which is currently due October 21, 2012, 3 will be due January 23, 2013; 4 5. In the event that the parties do not settle and the stay is lifted, the parties are to 5 submit an updated joint case management conference statement and a revised Joint Preliminary 6 Pretrial Statement on January 23, 2013; 7 6. The further status conference currently set for October 26, 2012 at 10:00 AM (D.I. February 1 8 266) is adjourned until _______________________, 2013; and 9 7. The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently set for November 2, 2012 at 11:00 VACATED and will be rescheduled if necessary. 10 AM (D.I. 264) is adjourned until ________________________, 2013. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 16 10/10/2012 Dated: ________________ Honorable Edward J. Davila United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02425.51966/4999945.1 Case No. 5:11-CV-00234 EJD -2[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING JOINT MOTION FOR FURTHER STAY OF THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING SETTLEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?