Sturm v. The World et al

Filing 17

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge Koh on 3/4/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of mailing)(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2011)

Download PDF
Sturm v. The World et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 11-CV-00236-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION KIEL J. STURM, Plaintiff, v. THE WORLD, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 11-CV-00236-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE On January 21, 2011, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to the screening provisions of the in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days. The Court advised Plaintiff that if he did not file an amended complaint within 30 days of the Order, his case would be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff subsequently moved for reconsideration. In its order denying Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, the Court reminded Plaintiff that he had until February 21, 2011 to file an amended complaint. The Court again stated that if Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, or submit a well-justified request for an extension of time, by February 21, 2011, the Court would dismiss the case with prejudice. The deadline set by the Court has now passed, and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or a request for an extension of time. Accordingly, the Court hereby DISMISSES the instant action with prejudice. The clerk shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 4, 2011 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?