Beckett v. MACYSDSNB

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 7 REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Deadline for ADR Session: 90 days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/30/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2011)

Download PDF
Beckett v. MACYSDSNB Doc. 10 *E-FILED 03-30-2011* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GARNER BECKETT CASE NO. 5: 11-cv-00246-HRL v. MACYSDSNB STIPULATION AND ========== [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS [Re: Docket No. 7] Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The palties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Nan-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) J Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Porties ~vlro helie~le ml early settle~fterrt that corfere~lce wit11a Magistrate Judge is rrppreciahly more likely to nieet their rreeds t/7m1any otlrer~ O ~ IofADR, nltrstparficipnte irr a7 I I 1 arrd a ADR pkorre conferer~ce may rloffile tlfisfornl. They rilllst ir~steaclfile Notice ofNeed for ADR Pltolle Colference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ALW L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Private ADR (please iderrtfiprocess arrdprovider) The palties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The rlenrlli~te 90 &ys@onr tlre rlrrte of the order is J referrirlg tlre case to a11ADR process tnrless otherwise ordered ) other requested deadline Dated: 3/29/2011 Dated: 3/29/2011 IS/Adam C. Fulli~~an Attorney for Plaintiff - IS/Tatiana Sillall - Attorney for Defendant Dockets.Justia.com [PROPOSED] ========== ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby sefened to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) J Mediation Private ADR 4 Deadline for ADR sessio~~ 90 days from the date of this order, other IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 30, 2011 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOWARD R. LLOYD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?