Milans v. Netflix, Inc.

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT re 9 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/3/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2011)

Download PDF
Milans v. Netflix, Inc. Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 KEITH E. EGGLETON, State Bar No. 159842 Email: keggleton@wsgr.com RODNEY G. STRICKLAND, State Bar No. 161934 Email: rstrickland@wsgr.com DALE BISH, State Bar No. 235390 Email: dbish@wsgr.com WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Attorneys for Defendant NETFLIX, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION JEFF MILANS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware Corporation 17 Defendant, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 case; STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 11 CV 0379 JF ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 11 CV 0379 JF STIPULATION AND -----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed and served a class action complaint alleging certain claims against defendant Netflix, Inc. ("Netflix") for alleged violations of certain privacy and consumer protection statutes; WHEREAS, Netflix has requested and Plaintiff has agreed to an extension of time for Netflix to respond to the complaint; and WHEREAS, this proposed extension would have no effect on the current schedule for the -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that: 1. 2. Netflix shall respond to the complaint no later than April 1, 2011. This stipulation is without prejudice to the rights, claims, or defenses of any party, and shall not be used by Netflix as evidence of, or to support any argument that, Plaintiff has not timely pursued his claims or has not been diligent. Dated: February 24, 2011 /s/ Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Attorneys for Defendant NETFLIX, INC. Dated: February 24, 2011 /s/ Sean Reis Sean Reis EDELSON McGUIRE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 11 CV 0379 JF -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 3/3/11 ------------------- ORDER [PROPOSED] Defendant shall respond to the complaint no later than April 1, 2011. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. THE HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 11 CV 0379 JF -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, Rodney G. Strickland, Jr., am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Regarding Defendant's Response to the Complaint. I hereby attest Sean Reis has concurred in this filing. Dated: February 24, 2011 /s/ Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Attorneys for Defendant NETFLIX, INC. STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 11 CV 0379 JF -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?