Milans v. Netflix, Inc.

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT re 9 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/3/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2011)

Milans v. Netflix, Inc.

Doc. 13

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

KEITH E. EGGLETON, State Bar No. 159842 Email: [e-mail] RODNEY G. STRICKLAND, State Bar No. 161934 Email: [e-mail] DALE BISH, State Bar No. 235390 Email: [e-mail] WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant NETFLIX, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

JEFF MILANS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,

15 v. 16 NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware Corporation 17 Defendant, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 case;
STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 11 CV 0379 JF

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO.: 11 CV 0379 JF STIPULATION AND -----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed and served a class action complaint alleging certain claims against defendant Netflix, Inc. ("Netflix") for alleged violations of certain privacy and consumer protection statutes; WHEREAS, Netflix has requested and Plaintiff has agreed to an extension of time for Netflix to respond to the complaint; and WHEREAS, this proposed extension would have no effect on the current schedule for the

-1Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that: 1. 2. Netflix shall respond to the complaint no later than April 1, 2011. This stipulation is without prejudice to the rights, claims, or defenses of any party,

and shall not be used by Netflix as evidence of, or to support any argument that, Plaintiff has not timely pursued his claims or has not been diligent.

Dated: February 24, 2011 /s/ Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Attorneys for Defendant NETFLIX, INC.

Dated: February 24, 2011 /s/ Sean Reis Sean Reis EDELSON McGUIRE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 11 CV 0379 JF

-2-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 3/3/11

------------------- ORDER [PROPOSED] Defendant shall respond to the complaint no later than April 1, 2011. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

THE HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL

STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 11 CV 0379 JF

-3-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I, Rodney G. Strickland, Jr., am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Regarding Defendant's Response to the Complaint. I hereby attest Sean Reis has concurred in this filing.

Dated: February 24, 2011 /s/ Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Attorneys for Defendant NETFLIX, INC.

STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 11 CV 0379 JF

-4-