Everist Genomics, Inc v. Merchant

Filing 34

Correction of Docket # 33 . ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 10/18/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MICHAEL R. MATTHIAS, Bar No. 57728 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 12100 Wilshire Blvd., 15th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90025-7120 Telephone: 310.820.8800 Facsimile: 310.820.8859 Email: mmatthias@bakerlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants ANGIOLOGIX INC. and EVERIST GENOMICS, INC. and Counter-Defendants WILLIAM WORZEL, STEVE EVERIST, TOM EVERIST, PRASAD SUNKARA, ALEX CHARLTON, and NORTHSTAR CAPITAL ADVISORS GROUP, LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 ANGIOLOGIX INC., a Delaware corporation, 12 LOS A NG EL ES ATTO RNEY S AT LAW B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP 11 13 Plaintiff, Case No. CV 11-00434 LHK Honorable Lucy H. Koh v. STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 14 MARIA A. MERCHANT, ET AL. 15 Defendants. 16 AND RELATED COUNTER ACTION 17 18 EVERIST GENOMICS, INC., a Michigan corporation, Case No. CV 11-00437 LHK 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 MARIA A. MERCHANT, ET AL. 22 Defendants. 23 24 AND RELATED COUNTER ACTION 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL CASE NOS. CV11-00434 LHK AND CV11-00437 LHK 503792657 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants 2 ANGIOLOGIX INC. and EVERIST GENOMICS, INC. and Counter-Defendants WILLIAM 3 WORZEL, STEVE EVERIST, TOM EVERIST, PRASAD SUNKARA, ALEX CHARLTON, 4 and NORTHSTAR CAPITAL ADVISORS GROUP, and Defendants and Counter-Claimants 5 MARIA A. MERCHANT and ALEXANDR S. PARFENOV and Defendant ANGIOSCAN LTD. 6 through their designated attorneys of record, that the above-captioned actions be and hereby are 7 dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), with all parties to bear their own costs and 8 attorneys’ fees. 9 Dated: October 18, 2011 10 s/Michael R. Matthias Michael R. Matthias Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants ANGIOLOGIX INC. and EVERIST GENOMICS, INC. and Counter-Defendants WILLIAM WORZEL, STEVE EVERIST, TOM EVERIST, PRASAD SUNKARA, ALEX CHARLTON, and NORTHSTAR CAPITAL ADVISORS GROUP, LLC 12 LOS A NG EL ES ATTO RNEY S AT LAW B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP 11 13 14 15 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP MICHAEL R. MATTHIAS Dated: October 18, 2011 16 MCPHARLIN SPRINKLES & THOMAS LLP s/Thomas R. Hogan Thomas R. Hogan Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Claimants MARIA A. MERCHANT and ALEXANDR S. PARFENOV, and DEFENDANT ANGIOSCAN LTD. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL CASE NOS. CV11-00434 LHK AND CV11-00437 LHK 503792657 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 ANGIOLOGIX INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, 12 LOS A NG EL ES ATTO RNEY S AT LAW B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP 11 13 14 Honorable Lucy H. Koh v. MARIA A. MERCHANT, ET AL. [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL Defendants. 15 16 Case No. CV 11-00434 LHK AND RELATED COUNTER ACTION 17 18 EVERIST GENOMICS, INC., a Michigan corporation, 19 20 21 Case No. CV 11-00437 LHK Plaintiff, v. MARIA A. MERCHANT, ET AL. 22 Defendants. 23 24 AND RELATED COUNTER ACTION 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL CASE NOS. CV11-00434 LHK AND CV11-00437 LHK 503793447 1 After considering the stipulation between the parties filed in this matter, and good cause 2 appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the above-captioned actions are DISMISSED with 3 prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), with all parties to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: October 18, 2011 7 8 HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH 9 10 12 LOS A NG EL ES ATTO RNEY S AT LAW B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL CASE NOS. CV11-00434 LHK AND CV11-00437 LHK 503793447

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?