Cave Consulting Group, LLC v. Ingenix, Inc.

Filing 388

ORDER GRANTING 381 Stipulation to Modify Post-Trial Briefing Deadlines. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/6/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2015)(Correction of 387 )

1
2
3

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
Patricia A. Welch (Cal. Bar No. 127889)
305 Lytton Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Andrew Leibnitz (State Bar No. 184723)
[e-mail]
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
J. Thomas Vitt (pro hac vice)
Shannon L. Bjorklund (pro hac vice)
David A. Couillard (pro hac vice)
Suite 1500, 50 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

David W. Harlan (pro hac vice)
Richard L. Brophy (pro hac vice)
Mark A. Thomas (pro hac vice)
Zachary C. Howenstine
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
7700 Forsyth Blvd. Suite 1800
St. Louis, MO 63105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

ANDREWS KURTH LLP
Paul D. Ackerman (pro hac vice)
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Attorneys for Plaintiff
CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.

14
15

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff
OPTUMINSIGHT, INC.

16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN JOSE DIVISION
20
21

CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.,
Plaintiff/Counterclaim
Defendant,

22
23
24

vs.

CASE NO. 5:11-CV-0469-EJD
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO MODIFY POST-TRIAL
BRIEFING DEADLINES

OPTUMINSIGHT, INC.,

25
26

Defendant/Counterclaim
Plaintiff.

27
28
-1JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
MODIFY POST-TRIAL BRIEFING DEADLINES

CASE NO. 5:11-CV-0469-EJD

1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, and subject to the approval of the Court, Plaintiff and

2
3

Counterclaim Defendant Cave Consulting Group, Inc. (“CCGroup”) and Defendant and

4

Counterclaim Plaintiff OptumInsight, Inc. (“OptumInsight”), by their undersigned attorneys, hereby

5

stipulate to modifying the post-trial briefing deadlines.

6

WHEREAS, CCGroup filed its Motion Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2) and 35 U.S.C. § 285

7
For Attorneys’ Fees (“Motion for Attorneys’ Fees”), (Dkt. 373), on April 20, 2015, and the deadline
8
9

for OptumInsight to respond is May 4, 2015, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a);
WHEREAS, CCGroup’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees is 24 pages long, and accompanied by

10
11

13 exhibits;

12
13

WHEREAS, CCGroup also filed a Bill of Costs on April 20, 2015, (Dkt. 374), and the
deadline to file objections to CCGroup’s Bill of Costs is also May 4, 2015;

14

WHEREAS, May 4, 2015, was also the deadline for OptumInsight to file its Renewed Motion

15
for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Alternative Motion for a New Trial, which OptumInsight filed
16
17

on April 29, 2015 (Dkt. 379);
WHEREAS, counsel for both parties have conferred and agree that, due to the volume of

18
19

post-trial briefing and the complexity of the issues involved, a modification to the post-trial briefing

20

deadlines is necessary for the parties to fully and adequately present their arguments and authorities

21

to assist the Court in its disposition of these issues;

22

WHEREAS, these deadlines have not previously been amended;

23
WHEREAS, the parties do not anticipate that these modifications will adversely affect the

24
25

date of the scheduled post-trial hearing, which is set for June 24, 2015;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that, subject the approval of the

26
27

Court:

28
-2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
MODIFY POST-TRIAL BRIEFING DEADLINES

CASE NO. 5:11-CV-0469-EJD

1
2
3
4
5
6

1. OptumInsight’s response to CCGroup’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees shall be filed on May
18, 2015;
2. CCGroup’s Reply in support of CCGroup’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees shall be filed on
June 1, 2015;
3. CCGroup’s response to OptumInsight’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of
Law and Alternative Motion for a New Trial shall be filed on May 27, 2015; and

7
4. OptumInsight’s Reply in support of OptumInsight’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a
8
9

Matter of Law and Alternative Motion for a New Trial shall be filed on June 10, 2015.

10
11

DATED: May 1, 2015

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP

12
13
By: s/David A. Couillard
David A. Couillard

14
15

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff
OPTUMINSIGHT, INC.

16
17
18
19

DATED: May 1, 2015

ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP

20
21
22
23
24

By: s/Richard L. Brophy
Richard L. Brophy
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant
CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.

25
26
27
28
-3JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
MODIFY POST-TRIAL BRIEFING DEADLINES

CASE NO. 5:11-CV-0469-EJD

PROPOSED ORDER
1
2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5

DATED:

5/6/2015

HONORABLE EDWARD J. DAVILA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
MODIFY POST-TRIAL BRIEFING DEADLINES

CASE NO. 5:11-CV-0469-EJD